“西藏真相”集会 已安排警察保安近百人

最初由 Humanity 发布： 找出藏独的幕后黑老大? NED of USA 谁雇佣藏独？ NED of USA 谁雇佣法轮功？ NED of USA 谁雇佣闹奥运的"记者"？ NED of USA 谁雇佣"民运"？ NED of USA http://www.sinomania.com/CHINANEWS/#Read 谁雇佣藏独？ NED of USA Into the twenty-first century, via the National Endowment for "Democracy" and other conduits that are more respectable sounding than the CIA, the U.S. Congress continued to allocate an annual $2 million to Tibetans in India, with additional millions for “democracy activities” within the Tibetan exile community. 谁雇佣法轮功？ NED of USA The Epoch Times Anti-China propaganda broadsheet that is distributed free throughout the USA (mostly in the downtowns of major cities) and numerous other countries by its private publishers. The Epoch Times officers are known Falun Gong practitioners. It is a tool of Chinese dissident Li Hongzhi's Falun Dafa cult and the recipient of USA taxpayers' money via the National Endowment for "Democracy" and Freedom House. 谁雇佣闹奥运的"记者"？ NED of USA Reporters Without Borders / Reporters Sans Frontiers Paris based RSF was founded by Robert Menard, the self-styled "General Secretary" of the supposedly independent non-governmental group. RSF is anything but unbiased however and receives its funding from a variety of government sources including the US State Department and Ronald Reagan's National Endowment for "Democracy" , whose officers read like a who's who of neoconservatism and include nearly all of the signers of the "Project for a new American Century." RSF was banned by the United Nations in 2003 and kept away from its sessions on "human rights" because of its political activities. Through its financial contributer, TECRO (Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office), RSF is organizing a boycott of the Beijing Olympics. RSF is a font of anti-China news stories of dubious credibility. 谁雇佣"民运"？ NED of USA China Digital Times A news aggregator in blog format that is part of the Berkeley China Initiative at the University of California, Berkeley, the brain child of resident China expert Orville Schell. The news is from the usual sources — the New York Times, Voice of America, Daily Telegraph, AP, Reuters, etc., hence biased against the Chinese government. Moreover, Chief Editor Xiao Qiang was formerly director of New York City based Human Rights In China group, a high profile successful fundraiser for programs harshly critical of China and a recurrent recipient of large grants of USA federal government money via the National Endowment for "Democracy" (NED). USA, Stop selling extremism USA, Stop making civil war USA, Stop provoking ethnic conflict 👍️

最初由 waterring 发布： 西文媒体没有真相吗 华盛顿邮报：目击者说藏人追打警察* 华盛顿邮报星期四在头版刊登了《目击者见证西藏恐怖的一天》的通讯。这篇报导的开头援引加拿大背包旅游者约翰.肯伍德的目击见闻说，大约200多名愤怒的藏人在3月14号下午喊着西藏自由的口号，在拉萨市中心一条狭窄的街道上追打防暴警察。 报导说，能够把防暴警察追得夹着尾巴逃命，那种感觉的确非常来劲，石头雨点般飞过来；一些警察在逃跑的过程中沿途扔下了盾牌。报导说，追击的藏人慢了下来，有的开始往回走；他们满脸微笑，彼此拍着对方的后背；随后，藏人们开始分成小组活动，有的掏出腰刀，有的在搜集石块，寻找下一个目标。 *中国媒体抨击西方媒体违背客观公正* 华盛顿邮报不仅报导了中国当局的镇压，也详细报导了冲突过程中一些极端分子火烧商店、追打汉人的情况。 然而，中国人民日报的强国论坛却激烈抨击西方媒体对拉萨三.一四事件的报导“虚构夸张、捕风捉影、凭空捏造，完全违背了客观公正的原则。他们恐怕并非无知，而是偏见使他们有意无视真相，混淆视听”。 明白了，原来西方媒体就华盛顿邮报一家。

谁雇佣藏独？ NED of USA 谁雇佣法轮功？ NED of USA 谁雇佣闹奥运的"记者"？ NED of USA 谁雇佣"民运"？ NED of USA http://www.sinomania.com/CHINANEWS/#Read 谁雇佣藏独？ NED of USA Into the twenty-first century, via the National Endowment for "Democracy" and other conduits that are more respectable sounding than the CIA, the U.S. Congress continued to allocate an annual $2 million to Tibetans in India, with additional millions for “democracy activities” within the Tibetan exile community. 谁雇佣法轮功？ NED of USA The Epoch Times Anti-China propaganda broadsheet that is distributed free throughout the USA (mostly in the downtowns of major cities) and numerous other countries by its private publishers. The Epoch Times officers are known Falun Gong practitioners. It is a tool of Chinese dissident Li Hongzhi's Falun Dafa cult and the recipient of USA taxpayers' money via the National Endowment for "Democracy" and Freedom House. 谁雇佣闹奥运的"记者"？ NED of USA Reporters Without Borders / Reporters Sans Frontiers Paris based RSF was founded by Robert Menard, the self-styled "General Secretary" of the supposedly independent non-governmental group. RSF is anything but unbiased however and receives its funding from a variety of government sources including the US State Department and Ronald Reagan's National Endowment for "Democracy" , whose officers read like a who's who of neoconservatism and include nearly all of the signers of the "Project for a new American Century." RSF was banned by the United Nations in 2003 and kept away from its sessions on "human rights" because of its political activities. Through its financial contributer, TECRO (Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office), RSF is organizing a boycott of the Beijing Olympics. RSF is a font of anti-China news stories of dubious credibility. 谁雇佣"民运"？ NED of USA China Digital Times A news aggregator in blog format that is part of the Berkeley China Initiative at the University of California, Berkeley, the brain child of resident China expert Orville Schell. The news is from the usual sources — the New York Times, Voice of America, Daily Telegraph, AP, Reuters, etc., hence biased against the Chinese government. Moreover, Chief Editor Xiao Qiang was formerly director of New York City based Human Rights In China group, a high profile successful fundraiser for programs harshly critical of China and a recurrent recipient of large grants of USA federal government money via the National Endowment for "Democracy" (NED). USA, Stop selling extremism USA, Stop making civil war USA, Stop provoking ethnic conflict

http://www.sinomania.com/CHINANEWS/#Read How to Read the News about China CONSIDER THE SOURCE! Every minute of every hour of every day news stories are reported and broadcast about what's going on in and around China. Many of the sources are reliable but many are not. Many news reports on China are from reporters or commentators who are located far from China. Some have never been to China and know nothing about the country. Whenever you read the news about China it is essential to stop and evaluate the source before you can believe what you've read. Print Media Dominates China News Despite all the advances in modern technology most news about China comes to us from the oldest media – the printed page. Newspapers and magazines (including specialized and "scholarly" journals) spread most of the news about China. The exception is business and financial news where some online services (usually requiring paid subscription) are also a primary source. Prevalence of Anti-China Bias Many of these newspapers and magazines have long-standing anti-China editorial biases. Often this bias is subtle and reflected only in the "voice" of the source. For example, a story about a Chinese government agency shutting down some illegal Internet "café's because they are unlicensed businesses prompts an editor to pen the headline "China Bans Internet Access". This voice shapes and warps our understanding of China and is based on an elitist view deeply and often unconsciously ingrained in many Westerners that China is a brutal and backward place and in need of betterment. While most major print media and broadcast/satellite television now have reporters in China, they are usually only in the capital Beijing. Thus reports on events outside the capital in the vast expanse of mainland China are often based on hearsay and not researched or investigated. Most major newsrooms still get their information on what's going on in China from the Chinese media itself and from translating and analyzing such things as government reports and the minutes of party meetings. These methods have changed little over the past half century.

最初由 道听途说 发布： 可怜,可悲的中国人啊? 你是中国人不是？你自己可怜可悲，踩着你的轮子呆一边哭嚎去吧！ 顶！！！！！！！！！！！！！

你们是好样的，支持你们的行动。杨宝凤有气度，用行动证明了自己的价值。

最初由 waterring 发布： 喇嘛的哭诉,说明了什么? 　　　　　　　　　 　 原以为只是演戏的采访，冷不丁，出现了精彩的戏中戏。.由中国政府组织的境外记者采访团星期四（3月27日）在拉萨目睹喇嘛抗议。 　　　应该说，这次采访是由中共精心组织的，目的在于宣传西藏拉萨的和谐以及西藏骚乱的真实真实，说得明白点就是要让全国全世界人民都说中共镇压得好镇压得应该。然而半路杀出的程咬金让中共出尽了丑，虽然这仅仅只有十五分钟的时间，但它却传递了许多耐人寻味的东西。 　　　表象：喇嘛说出了他们的心理话，在西藏自治区他们没有自治权，至少他们的言论权被中共剥夺了。他们崇拜达赖，他们追求自由，但他们也反对暴力。 　　　潜台词：这才是最耐人寻味的。按理说，中共导演的戏一般不易演砸，这次采访的内容，导向，中共应该是绝对有把握的，可为什么还出现这经典的戏外戏呢？这不外乎以下几点的推测：１这些年轻的喇嘛还算听话，中共官员想他们不至于干出对党对“人民”不利的事，所以让他们接近由中共组织的采访团。但这些有良知的喇嘛们还是冒着危险说出了他们的心理话，由此可见中共在拉萨的所做做为是多么的不得人心。２中共官员中的有良知的人将消息传递给了这些喇嘛，这种可能性也很大。因为这些喇嘛能在这精确的时间，精确的地点出现在采访团的前面，没有点内幕消息是很难做到的。这说明中共的倒行异施已被中共中的正义人士所不齿，他们最懂得所谓暴乱的真相，但他们显然不能明说，于是就把消息传递给了这些年轻喇嘛。 得道多助，失道寡助，我们希望中共当局认清形势，抱着宽容和真诚的态度解决好西藏的问题，还西藏一个自由的天空。 好多人说那个哭的喇嘛好像是假的！ 照片上一看上去就觉得那个喇嘛与众不同。西藏喇嘛披着袈裟一般是露着一只胳臂在外面的。这个喇嘛的袈裟穿的不清不楚，里边根本穿着便服！哪里有胳膊露在外面？有一张照片好像几个喇嘛要和他争论。我觉得这个喇嘛是假的。周正龙有假老虎，难道大昭寺有假喇嘛？？

最初由 waterring 发布： 中国的多少历史都是被人歪曲的?就中共自己承认的歪曲事实真相就有多少啦?连国家主席都可以变成叛徒的. 可是我们还有多少国民正相信着所谓的真相呢? 可怜,可悲的中国人啊? 你是中国人不是？你自己可怜可悲，踩着你的轮子呆一边哭嚎去吧！

中国的多少历史都是被人歪曲的?就中共自己承认的歪曲事实真相就有多少啦?连国家主席都可以变成叛徒的. 可是我们还有多少国民正相信着所谓的真相呢? 可怜,可悲的中国人啊?

顺便游行的时候也为你们同龄的先辈, 二十年前血洒天安门 的你们的牺牲的兄长门默哀,因为在这里你们可以保证坦克不会碾过你们年轻的躯体.

喇嘛的哭诉,说明了什么? 　　　　　　　　　 　 原以为只是演戏的采访，冷不丁，出现了精彩的戏中戏。.由中国政府组织的境外记者采访团星期四（3月27日）在拉萨目睹喇嘛抗议。 　　　应该说，这次采访是由中共精心组织的，目的在于宣传西藏拉萨的和谐以及西藏骚乱的真实真实，说得明白点就是要让全国全世界人民都说中共镇压得好镇压得应该。然而半路杀出的程咬金让中共出尽了丑，虽然这仅仅只有十五分钟的时间，但它却传递了许多耐人寻味的东西。 　　　表象：喇嘛说出了他们的心理话，在西藏自治区他们没有自治权，至少他们的言论权被中共剥夺了。他们崇拜达赖，他们追求自由，但他们也反对暴力。 　　　潜台词：这才是最耐人寻味的。按理说，中共导演的戏一般不易演砸，这次采访的内容，导向，中共应该是绝对有把握的，可为什么还出现这经典的戏外戏呢？这不外乎以下几点的推测：１这些年轻的喇嘛还算听话，中共官员想他们不至于干出对党对“人民”不利的事，所以让他们接近由中共组织的采访团。但这些有良知的喇嘛们还是冒着危险说出了他们的心理话，由此可见中共在拉萨的所做做为是多么的不得人心。２中共官员中的有良知的人将消息传递给了这些喇嘛，这种可能性也很大。因为这些喇嘛能在这精确的时间，精确的地点出现在采访团的前面，没有点内幕消息是很难做到的。这说明中共的倒行异施已被中共中的正义人士所不齿，他们最懂得所谓暴乱的真相，但他们显然不能明说，于是就把消息传递给了这些年轻喇嘛。 得道多助，失道寡助，我们希望中共当局认清形势，抱着宽容和真诚的态度解决好西藏的问题，还西藏一个自由的天空。

倍受鼓舞，现场还能在筹集到更多。

华盛顿邮报：目击者说藏人追打警察* 华盛顿邮报星期四在头版刊登了《目击者见证西藏恐怖的一天》的通讯。这篇报导的开头援引加拿大背包旅游者约翰.肯伍德的目击见闻说，大约200多名愤怒的藏人在3月14号下午喊着西藏自由的口号，在拉萨市中心一条狭窄的街道上追打防暴警察。 报导说，能够把防暴警察追得夹着尾巴逃命，那种感觉的确非常来劲，石头雨点般飞过来；一些警察在逃跑的过程中沿途扔下了盾牌。报导说，追击的藏人慢了下来，有的开始往回走；他们满脸微笑，彼此拍着对方的后背；随后，藏人们开始分成小组活动，有的掏出腰刀，有的在搜集石块，寻找下一个目标。 *中国媒体抨击西方媒体违背客观公正* 华盛顿邮报不仅报导了中国当局的镇压，也详细报导了冲突过程中一些极端分子火烧商店、追打汉人的情况。 然而，中国人民日报的强国论坛却激烈抨击西方媒体对拉萨三.一四事件的报导“虚构夸张、捕风捉影、凭空捏造，完全违背了客观公正的原则。他们恐怕并非无知，而是偏见使他们有意无视真相，混淆视听”。

哥们，好样的！ 算我一份：经费不足，我捐钱！人手不够，我出力！ 其实，只要咋们中国团结一心，没有什么事情办不成的！所以，我相信，经费问题一定不是问题：到参加活动的那一天，一定会收到不少热钱的！起码我会那样做的！ 还有，如果需要出力的话，尽管说！