评论列表
  1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 本地 /
  3. TVO访谈视频:329发言人夏河被“围攻” /
  4. 全部评论 /

TVO访谈视频:329发言人夏河被“围攻”

阅读全文
我想让他们明白,为什么西方对中国的围攻实得其反: The Western Media and Politicians are Nourishing a New Generation of Chinese Patriotism The Chinese young people, or the "ME Generation" as TIME once put, are not particularly interested in politics, rather, they mainly mind their own business and enjoy life. To some extent they appreciate Western democracy and freedom, human rights concern and candid media. They could be the generation of transforming China, making her join the the world smoothly. The Chinese young people are expecting to celebrate the coming Beijing Olympic Games as a giant international party held at home town. Suddenly, in the middle of March, there were a group of well organized Tibetan extremists emerged in Lhasa streets. Their new strategy is to use violence to catch world attention and internationalize the Tibet issue. Taking advantage of the Chinese government, which was reluctant to use force at the beginning (the riot police were ordered not to fight back even being hit), these rioters succeeded in smashing and looting hundreds of shops, burning vehicles and buildings and even attacking and killing innocent civilians until the laws were enforced once again. After 17 years of peace and development in Tibet, the whole Chinese nation got a shock by the violent riots in Lhasa. The Chinese young people are even more shocked when overnight almost all Western media had the same headline: "China Crackdown Peaceful Tibetan Protests..."; major TV stations repeatedly played video clips with police clashed with monk protests in India and Nepal, but the Western audience were informed its Chinese police attacking peaceful Tibetans; pictures of Chinese police recurring civilians from mobs were explained as arresting innocent Tibetans...so and so, repeat and repeat... The whole world were shocked by the new crimes of the Chinese government over Tibetan human rights. Fooled by the repeated messages, motivated by their sacred responsibilities for human rights, waked up by their cold war mind, Western politicians started to talk about supporting Dalai Lama, challenging Chinese sovereignty and boycott of Beijing Olympics... One Western politician even said he was afraid of athletes going to Beijing could have blood in their shoes... (only he had not realized its innocent Chinese blood shed for the Tibetan extremists to trigger an anti-China concert...) The Chinese young people got shocked, confused and angered by all these farces performed by Tibetan extremists cooperated with Western media and politicians. Their respects or illusions to the Western democracy and freedom, to the Western media have been crushed. They have started to re-think about the real meaning of the "human rights", for which the West always holds the banner and uses it to criticize many regimes they don't like. For those innocent Chinese who were attacked or killed by Tibetan mobs in Lhasa, where are their human rights? Why their attackers are not condemned by a single Western politician? By wrongfully condemn China for the riots, the West is encouraging violence, since the extremists now believe their new strategy is working... Yes, it's working. After the recent "uprising" in Tibet, the Western media and leaders acted quickly in condemning China for her occupation of Tibet, for her human rights records and Dalai Lama has been even hailed as a hero and the symbol of peace and justice... The master-minders of the recent riots in Tibet and sabotages of Olympic torch relays everywhere have many reasons to grin; however, probably they feel happy too soon. Let's look at the reality. First, China's sovereignty over Tibet has existed for 700 years and recognized internationally. As a matter of fact, the current 14th Dalai Lama was authorized by the President Chiang Kai Sheik of then The Republic of China. That's why when CNN live broadcasting the San Francisco torch relay event, they only repeatedly saying the protests were against China's human rights records including some of China's international partners rather than the "Chinese occupation". Therefore, the dream of splitting China goes nowhere. Second, the human rights issue: Beijing won the bid of 2008 Olympic Games in 2001. It must have considered many aspects of China including the human rights situation at that time. Now after seven years, objectively speaking, China's human rights situation is better. China is more open than seven years ago; Chinese people's living standard has been improving continuously. Especially the living standard of Tibetan people is unprecedentedly improved than seven years ago. In the other hand, before 1950s' social reform, Tibetan social system was darker than the Middle Ages in Europe, when lower class Tibetan people had no minimum human rights and were treated as animals (at that time, Dalai was also the head of the Tibetan Administration). Therefore, when the West condemns China over the human rights records in Tibet, their arguments are groundless and hypocritical. Finally, the true winner of current anti-China farces will be the Chinese Communist Party, which, after the collapse of USSR and the classical Marxism theory fading away, is struggling to rally the people with patriotism but not very effective so far except the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games, which raised the enthusiasm of the entire Chinese nation. Now that there were separatists riots internally, followed by the media manipulation then the anti-China concert internationally that overshadowed the brightness and joy of the Games, the dream of century for Chinese people. The Chinese people, especially the young generation are hurt the most. They are good educated and well informed. They knew what happened in China and they watched what the West media and politicians are saying and doing that smashed their original impression about the West. The Chinese nation is a sort of strange, whenever there are pressures from outside, the whole nation will be mobilized, solidified and their patriotism will become overwhelming. Now the new wounds waked up the old ones, the invasion of 8 Western powers into Beijing in1900 become so fresh, millions upon millions Chinese connected to the Internet fighting for the justice of their country is a good proof. The Western anti-China propaganda has just given China’s “Me Generation” a large dosage of Patriotic-Boost with extra strength, much more effective than preaches from the Communist Party. In the Web, there is a picture taken by a Chinese young man during the torch relay in Pairs showing a pretty Chinese young lady in her wheelchair being attacked by a group of pro-Tibetan thugs. A very ugly-faced Tibetan man wrapped with separatism flag was trying to grab the Olympic torch from her while the handicapped young lady fought her best to protect the torch, the symbol of Peace and Harmony, the symbol of dignity of Chinese people. This is another kind of "Beauty and Beast". The Chinese people will remember this image for another generation. The next generation of Chinese leaders, grown out from the current "ME Generation", will remember this image and the show of Western democracy and human rights of today.
回复
7楼的很搞笑,人们选择在哪里居住都有自己的理由,这理由有千千万万.你的说法太狭隘了吧,真不知道你就是这智商还是别有用心 我看夏河表现得很得体,不卑不亢的.
回复
我觉得没有报道在一定程度上是好事。 你真的希望全加拿大人都知道了后问你为什么这里这么不好,你们为什么不回中国。还有,如果人家问你:听说在中国,你们没有这个权力这么游行。你怎么回答。请教。因为我被人家问过这个问题。
回复
民主人士认为4.13集会背后有中国政府的支持,理由是抗议者一下子拿出了那么多面制作精致的中国国旗。
回复
对于为什么主流媒体几十个藏独抗议都报道,却不报道华人欢迎火炬,民主人士的解释是媒体之报道负面新闻。
回复
你说说他们举的例子对吗:如果你不支持爱国,就把你的电话号码,家里的地址发到网上。 请回答 别人说的是难听,可是难道这些不是一些粪青在做的吗。别告诉我在爱国的名义下什么都可以做。
回复
那几个民主人士有个结论: 加拿大近十年从大陆来了15万移民,这是在玩火,因为大陆来的中国人,不像80年代从香港来的移民,他们只要有人反对中国,不管为什么反对都站在中国这一边,因为他们永远都只支持中国,言下之意,中国人都是一些不讲道理的人。并举了攻击王千源的例子说明中国人是多么不可理喻。 民主人士为破环火炬传递的解释是: 他们反的是中国政府,不是中国人民。夏河认为他们反的就是中国人。 民主人士认为既然是加拿大人,就不应该举中国旗在加拿大抗议,弄得他们在加拿大都没脸见人。
回复
刚仔细看完,谈谈初步感想: 1。基本大家是摆事实,讲道理。心平气和。 2。连夏河也承认双方的媒体都是有失误。而且他也同意如果西方媒体要攻击GCT可以,但是别把中国人带上。这也是觉得西方媒体的错误所在。 3。至于一些粪青所说为什么不请大陆移民参加。想想王千源同学的遭遇吧,就是请了,如果他有不同于所谓的‘爱国者’的想法,敢说吗。 首先我声明,我不是你们说的轮子。还有,要骂的话,请在完全看完这个视频后再骂。 http://www.tvo.org/cfmx/tvoorg/tvoutils/globalfiles/VideoPop.cfm?spot_id=5371&sitefolder=theagenda
回复
🙂 ☹️
回复
x
x