回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：不懂这个文章的中心思想是什么！
我还真有在加拿大“打狗”的故事，回头讲给你听。稍候。 😁
还是说说“打狗”吧：
去年初秋，吃完晚饭骑自行车去不远处的步道锻炼锻炼，刚出家门100多米，还在小街上，忽见一中型狗狂吠追逐一十岁出头的小女孩。在下毫不犹豫，骑将过去，跳下车来，让过女孩，挡住恶犬，再飞起一脚踢将过去，恶犬闪开，刚要来个连环脚，忽听后面小孩猛叫：Stop doing that! 我一愣，看看那狗不像要继续攻击，便转身问：那是你的狗？No. 你认识它？ No. 那你为什么不让我踢？He may thought I was an intruder on his territory. He would not hurt me. He does not deserve to be kicked.（大意） 我心里个气呀, 你怎么知道那狗是公的? 好人难做啊！后来一想也是, 那狗如果诚心要咬她, 不等我过去就咬上了. 但狗追人是不行的，在下于是带着那小孩找到狗主家，说明情况，狗主非常紧张，说是忘了关车库门，没拴的狗跑出去也不知道。但是，No excuse. Apologize. No 2nd time. That is it!
虽然那个被追的不是你老婆, 但我发誓, 当我看到狗追人的时候, 不会因被追的是你老婆还是个十岁出头的小女孩儿而反应有所区别的.
所以你说我把没有的事当真事说, 我不同意. 我没说过我从狗嘴下救过你老婆, 我只说恶犬威胁妇孺时我会挺身而出,而且我做到了.所以我现在也不知道我的帖子和我的为人错在哪里?
心态就不用您担心啦, 一个天天乐呵呵的东北淫, 心态能差吗? 😁
教育孩子,更不用您操心,我是言传, 更重身教, 孩子正在茁壮成长.
耍嘴皮子可不像您想的那么歪. 比较知名的耍嘴皮子的, 远有马三立老先生, 近有咱多伦多的飞哥, 严肃的有 Larry King, 轻松的有 Jay Leno. 嘴皮子耍好了可不易，思维要敏捷，逻辑要严密，知识面要广，个人经历要丰富，还要有正义感，您要说我耍嘴皮子，我可连玩儿票都不敢，我最多也就是有点正义感。我倒是希望我孩子以后能耍嘴皮子耍到 Jay Leno 那样，不过看来希望不大。 ☹️
说道“无理之狗”，不要以为你心里的狗都是“有理”的。电影 Alien 看过吗？有个心理医生写过一篇短文，说每个人身上都有一个 alien, 那就是恶魔，你自己如果不够强大，恶魔便会将你吞噬，只有 Ripley 那样正义并坚强的人才能生存下去。我心中的狗我自会打理，您身上的 Alien, 您也多加小心吧。 😎
[/QUOTE你看,这么晚了我还不得不回答此帖,你难道还当真要我把你那个中心思想想逐一分析一下吗?还是算了,驴唇不对马嘴,不再回你的帖,但是还是保留对你那个有关民主和一盘散沙的帖子 的好感,深以为然.一个人原来在不同的场合里会是那么的不同.一篇有趣的打狗故事,却说明不了什么问题.
Tax me! I'm Canadian. I'll roll over! from Canada writes:
I was trying to see how many people would agree to the creed, then surprise them by identifying it as Anarchic. Oh well, now the cat is out of the bag....
The term Anarchy has been hijacked by the establishment to depict Anarchists as unhygienic thugs who like to be violent and toss firebombs at things. To be sure, there are some self-professed Anarchists who are simply misguided folks or flat out criminals.
If you argue that 1% of society are psychopaths that crave power, how many of them work their way up in government and corporations? I wonder what the per-captita percentage is there? If people are inherently good, we don't need government. If people are inherently bad or apathetic, we don't dare form one.
Guess what folks. 99.99% of our relationship with our fellow humans is anarchic. We either act the way we do because of mutual self-respect for the other, which is generally why we can walk around our neighborhoods, go to work, and go to shopping centers and not attack each other. This isn't the result of some State oppressing us to do so or threatening us with violence if we don't. We just do.
When I drive down the road, I don't swerve into oncoming traffic to hit another car. Why? Because of the State enforcing the rules of the road? No. Because 👼 the last thing I want going through my head is my a$$hole, and 🍺 I don't want to hurt another human being. The consequences of my actions are immediate and I am responsible for them.
Most people are Anarchists! Surprise! 😀
[/QUOTE本想劝你不必困惑,细想此帖中的哲学含意,不由得我也困惑了,人们行事是为了规则,还是因为可怕的后果呢?也许两者兼而有之,比如民主国家里公民的行为方式;那么专制国家里百姓又是如何做的呢,好像被强迫成份更多些,我有些考虑不周,上床睡觉前会再考虑一下,能告知出处吗?若是你写的,非常钦佩你,并也收回所有对你的不敬之词.谢谢.
Tax me! I'm Canadian. I'll roll over! from Canada writes:
I was trying to see how many people would agree to the creed, then surprise them by identifying it as Anarchic. Oh well, now the cat is out of the bag....
The term Anarchy has been hijacked by the establishment to depict Anarchists as unhygienic thugs who like to be violent and toss firebombs at things. To be sure, there are some self-professed Anarchists who are simply misguided folks or flat out criminals.
If you argue that 1% of society are psychopaths that crave power, how many of them work their way up in government and corporations? I wonder what the per-captita percentage is there? If people are inherently good, we don't need government. If people are inherently bad or apathetic, we don't dare form one.
Guess what folks. 99.99% of our relationship with our fellow humans is anarchic. We either act the way we do because of mutual self-respect for the other, which is generally why we can walk around our neighborhoods, go to work, and go to shopping centers and not attack each other. This isn't the result of some State oppressing us to do so or threatening us with violence if we don't. We just do.
When I drive down the road, I don't swerve into oncoming traffic to hit another car. Why? Because of the State enforcing the rules of the road? No. Because 👼 the last thing I want going through my head is my a$$hole, and 🍺 I don't want to hurt another human being. The consequences of my actions are immediate and I am responsible for them.
Most people are Anarchists! Surprise! 😀
以我的亲历，漫谈一盘散沙的海外华人