内贾德联大发言时 加拿大代表退席抗议

妹子，看样子你又恢复胡说八道的本性了。 😁 你扔的绣球（哦，错了，是绣鞋） 😁 ，关我啥事？ 再说，给他内贾德十万个胆，他也不敢娶大老爷们啊，真主正看着他呢。 😁 您看，俺比您蛮有风度嘛！俺见您尊称您小马同志，对不？俺没称您“小马子同志或MM”啥地；也没称您：马可洛费奇同志，对不？当然，如果您认为称您同志，有让人误解成同性恋啥的，以后俺就不用同志二字，行不？ 够风度吧！ 😁

在哪儿？内贾德已经娶了四个老婆，没法再娶你了？ 😁 妹子，看样子你又恢复胡说八道的本性了。 😁 你扔的绣球（哦，错了，是绣鞋） 😁 ，关我啥事？ 再说，给他内贾德十万个胆，他也不敢娶大老爷们啊，真主正看着他呢。 😁

然也。😁 在哪儿？内贾德已经娶了四个老婆，没法再娶你了？ 😁

Ahmadinejad openly calls for the elimination of Israel, Jews, and says Holocaust never happened. He sounds more like a terrorist than the head of a state. It's right for the Canadian delegation to stage a walk-out protest during his speech. As on the matter of free speech, try to think of it this way, if CNN suddenly becomes like CCTV, Wall Street Journal becomes People's daily, do you think they would be able to keep any of their readers and audiences? That's the point, if in a country over 99% favor democracy and freedom, and only less than 1% are the sympathizers (like you guys) of communists, dictators and Islam extremists , what do you think the media of that country would do? That's right, the media would certainly take the position of the 99% of people that love freedom, and be disdainful of dictators like the Iranian President. That's why you can protest, you can shout, but you will never see the west media switch position to favor a dictator. 现代社会，言论自由并不是指你的嘴巴可以开口说话，公共言论必须通过媒体才能抵达大众的耳朵，我就不认为西方国家的媒体广泛而全面地报道了内贾德的讲话内容。不管讲话的内容好坏，无疑它是导致多个国家退席的重要讲话，但这却偏偏被西方媒体过滤掉了。这种你能说但不能报道的所谓言论自由，是最虚伪的政治把戏。那些被这种低级把戏玩弄于股掌之中的弱智，是人类智能发展进化的阻碍，也是优生学提倡的绝种对象。

您是位“有风度的人。” 😁 然也。😁

虽说胡大哥当年是中了你的招，但那是因为当时他喝醉了，误把你的绣鞋当绣球了。 再说听说内贾德已经娶了四个老婆，没法再娶你了。

小马同志：对不喜欢的人说的话，不管他说的是啥，咱就是不听，不报导，这跟言论自由并不矛盾！　这正是民主的体现。 😁 小说MM，我上文已经说了，我没说他们不“民主”，不“言论自由”。 瞧把你急得！ 😁 难得看你这么认真啊，怎么今天不准备胡说八道了？ 😁 放心！你再怎么胡说八道，咱都不会学那帮“言论自由”的家伙的。 也不会随便扔鞋子。 咱们是有风度的人。 😁

文章里不写着的吗？ 😁 对不喜欢的人说的话，不管他说的是啥，咱就是不听，不报导，这就叫民主”国家所谓的“言论自由”。 小马同志：对不喜欢的人说的话，不管他说的是啥，咱就是不听，不报导，这跟言论自由并不矛盾！　这正是民主的体现。 😁

听不得异议，还退场，真没风度和礼貌。 别怪加拿大代表了，美国代表都退了，加拿大代表敢不退吗？ 😁

是不是把鞋子脱下来，扔过去？ 😁 说MM不要总是用这招扔鞋倒追法嘛。 😁 虽说胡大哥当年是中了你的招，但那是因为当时他喝醉了，误把你的绣鞋当绣球了。 再说听说内贾德已经娶了四个老婆，没法再娶你了。😁

怪了!

是不是把鞋子脱下来，扔过去？ 😁 你觉得这行为文明吗？真不愧是个牛逼哄哄的“硕士”！

小马同志：　是怎么回事？　 😁 文章里不写着的吗？ 😁 对不喜欢的人说的话，不管他说的是啥，咱就是不听，不报导，这就叫民主”国家所谓的“言论自由”。

👎️ Free speech == you are free to speak to the public and no one is going to throw you to jail for your words. He's allowed to speak at the UN which is enough proof of the right for free speech. But whether there're anybody who are interested in listening to your speech, this is another matter

小胡MM，你别着急嘛。 😁 我又没说他们“不民主”，“不言论自由”啊。 我只是告诉大家：“民主”国家所谓的“言论自由”其实也就是这么回事。 😁 小马同志：　是怎么回事？　 😁

小马同志：别人也有不想听胡说八道的权力！这个跟言论自由并不矛盾！　这正是民主的体现。 😁 小胡MM，你别着急嘛。 😁 我又没说他们“不民主”，“不言论自由”啊。 我只是告诉大家：“民主”国家所谓的“言论自由”其实也就是这么回事。 😁

这就是“民主”国家所谓的“言论自由”。 😲 小马同志：别人也有不想听胡说八道的权力！这个跟言论自由并不矛盾！　这正是民主的体现。 😁

按俺们中国人的传统观念，退席的最起码是不尊重别人吧？！ 如果真要抗议，可以使用其他更文明的做法嘛！ 是不是把鞋子脱下来，扔过去？ 😁

他的发言很有道理，很显阿拉伯人的骨气。退席抗议者都是些美国的附庸，傻逼也。

Actually, you don’t have the knowledge of what is the human right. 我肯定比你知道得多。 😁

Free speech == you are free to speak to the public and no one is going to throw you to jail for your words. He's allowed to speak at the UN is enough proof of the right for free speech. But whether there's anybody who are interested in listening to your speech, this is another matter AGREE !!! 现代社会，言论自由并不是指你的嘴巴可以开口说话，公共言论必须通过媒体才能抵达大众的耳朵，我就不认为西方国家的媒体广泛而全面地报道了内贾德的讲话内容。不管讲话的内容好坏，无疑它是导致多个国家退席的重要讲话，但这却偏偏被西方媒体过滤掉了。这种你能说但不能报道的所谓言论自由，是最虚伪的政治把戏。那些被这种低级把戏玩弄于股掌之中的弱智，是人类智能发展进化的阻碍，也是优生学提倡的绝种对象。

其实讲的不错

按俺们中国人的传统观念，退席的最起码是不尊重别人吧？！ 如果真要抗议，可以使用其他更文明的做法嘛！

5毛不喜欢退场，喜欢跨省追捕。

听不得异议，还退场，真没风度和礼貌。

Free speech == you are free to speak to the public and no one is going to throw you to jail for your words. He's allowed to speak at the UN which is enough proof of the right for free speech. But whether there're anybody who are interested in listening to your speech, this is another matter 在联合国范围，还没有人可以把别国人因为任何原因扔进监狱，除了美国。你的解释与这次事件也是风牛马不相及。

这就是“民主”国家所谓的“言论自由”。 😲 Actually, you don’t have the knowledge of what is the human right.

Free speech == you are free to speak to the public and no one is going to throw you to jail for your words. He's allowed to speak at the UN is enough proof of the right for free speech. But whether there's anybody who are interested in listening to your speech, this is another matter AGREE !!!

Free speech == you are free to speak to the public and no one is going to throw you to jail for your words. He's allowed to speak at the UN which is enough proof of the right for free speech. But whether there're anybody who are interested in listening to your speech, this is another matter 展现了西方丑陋的“言论自由”

展现了西方丑陋的“言论自由”