1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 本地 /
  3. 北美时报:安省药物改革争议引人瞩目 /

北美时报:安省药物改革争议引人瞩目

现实生活中,任何一种改革都必然会引起诸多争议、众说纷纭、莫衷一是。改革的成功与失败,取决于改革者事先是否顾虑周详;一经落实进行,能否排除万难、勇往直前,坚持 [ 自反而缩,虽千万人,吾往矣 ] 的 无畏精神。

安省卫生厅长4月7日提出建议修改安省药物制度,如果获得省议会通过,将在5月15日实施。改革方案对政府资助的安省药物福利计划、私人雇主药物计划、制药商、药剂师和病人将产生重大影响。安省现时配方非专利药物的价钱比其他国家高出多达 80 %。这些药物包括治疗糖尿病、高血压、肠胃病和抑郁症等慢性疾病。昂贵的药物价格对病人造成沉重的经济负担 。造成药物价格昂贵的一个原因,是非专利药物制药商向选择存入其生产药物的药房提供专业补贴 ( Professional allowance ),数字高达 7亿5千万元 。制药商把这种专业补贴的支出附加在药物价格之上,令药物价格不断抬高。

安省政府的改革建议,将禁止非专利药物制药商向药房提供专业补贴 ,从而促使非专利药物的价格向下调整,达到品牌药物价格的 25 %。有例子显示,一种治疗精神抑郁症的非专利药物Citalopram,在现行制度下,病人每年要支付 346 元,但在新计划下只需付 114 元,节省 232 元。

改革方案中, 省府承诺拨款 1 亿 5 千万元补助药剂师为病人提供的专业服务,亦容许药剂师逐年增加处方配药费 ( Dispensing fees ),在农村和偏远社区的药房将会得到政府新增的拨款资助。

但安省药剂行业则对改革建议大力批评。据媒体报道,大型连锁药房、小型连锁店和个别经营的药剂师都表示,改革将大大影响他们的生意,他们将被迫关闭药房、裁员、减少工作时间和削减对病人的服务,例如上门送药、谘询和辅导等。其中 Shoppers Drug Mart 集团更率先缩短部份药房营业时间,以实际行动表示抗议。另一集团 Rexall亦宣布冻结招聘员工,和开始向病人收取送药服务费。看来药剂行业和省府的争端,若不能妥善解决, 将会越演越烈。更有甚者,一些别具用心的政客,利用省民对改革的一知半解进行煽风点火、以偏概全、歪曲事实,口口声声说为民请命,实际是想捞取政治得分!

平心而论,省府著眼于调整非专利药物的高昂价格,对需要自付药费的病人最为有利 。在安省药物福利计划中,政府每年花费高达 8亿元在老人和领取社会援助人士身上。非专利药物价格的下降,令省府可以节省大量开支,有能力把更多种类的新药物纳入安省药物福利计划中,使病人直接受惠,从而可以把节省得来的金钱去改善医院设施,增加医护人员,缩减急症室轮侯时间。对私人雇主资助的药物计划和医疗保险,新改革可以促使保险费调低,令更多人有能力负担。药物医保计划会更全面和普及化,更多人的健康得到保障。对安省纳税人来说,取消专业补贴,可以使非专利药物价格下降,令纳税人节省数以亿计的金钱。 有报道显示,过去有 70 %的专业补贴被滥用,作为提高药房利润,而非 提供病人服务。

省府在改革药物制度的过程中,必须谨慎和具有弹性, 预防一些可能发生的情况,例如某些药物价格下降影响制药商的生产和供应不足。 省府亦必须确保药剂师行业的收入得到充份保障, 不会影响 对病人的服务。总括而言,安省政府今次采取果断的行动来调整药物价格和修改医药系统,是朝正确方向迈进一大步。

网友评论

网友评论仅供其表达个人看法,并不表明 51.CA 立场。
Pharmacy cuts is bad for Ontario This is not good legislation for the people of Ontario. It has been said that this will benefit the patient — however, it will not benefit the patient when they cannot find a pharmacy in their hometown or talk to a pharmacist when they need one. the proposals for reform will have a negative effect on people in Ontario. In 2003, the government in South Africa introduced a similar scheme that eliminated all forms of rebates and discounts and failed to properly provide replacement funding for pharmacies. As a consequence, over 500 community pharmacies closed. McGuinty government is proposing a massive funding cut to community pharmacies in the amount of $1 billion a year. This is equivalent to cutting approximately three pharmacists from each pharmacy in Ontario. What you may not know is the impact this will have on seniors, young families and basically anyone who walks into the pharmacy to see their pharmacist. How many more unnecessary emergency room visits will there be if pharmacists are unavailable to the public when their doctor’s offices are closed? How much will this cost the Ontario health-care system?
回复
Why are there so many pharm students all of a sudden...
回复
The issue is with Canada's free health care system, the $6 difference of dispensing fee has to be covered either by Ontario government or patient. Ontario government does not want to pay for it, they lost billions in eHealth scandals, so in the end, patients have to pay for it. Lower the drug price is a good thing, but Ontario government has to cover $14 dispensing fee for those ODB (Ontario Drug Benefit) patients, mostly seninors.
回复
如果是6楼说的那样,那就是政府把应该补助的资金让消费者自己来付。 如果通过这个法案,政府不能肯定的保证所有省下的资金就按他们说的分布。因为本来加拿大的Politicians就是骗子,在选举的时候可以说一半的真话,一半的假话
回复
You only see one side of the coin, not the other side. The average cost for dispensing a prescription in Canada is $14. Currently Ontario government only allows pharmacist charges $7. Under the new plan, it will be $8. The missing $6 will have to be gotten from the patients. There is no other way to maintain the cost for Pharmacist and provide any extra service. If you have been in USA or Europe, you will see the different service from those countries' pharmacies. For example, the big USA pharmacy stores has instructed pharmacist NOT TO TALK to the patients, because it will slow down the prescription process and increase the cost. Here, in Canada, a lot of patients rely on their pharmacists when dealing with drugs. Lots of pharmacists know the patients for more than 10-20 years. With this reform, all this consultation will be diminished, also the currently free home delivery service will charge cost to the patients. It ends up eventually that patients need to pay more to get the same or even less service than currently they are enjoying. Canada is an aging country, more and more people are in their 60-70's, and the number of prescriptions are increasing steadily. With this reform, I can see that in the mid term, Ontario's new graduated pharmacists will be harder to find the job. In the long term it will be bad for the Ontario residents.
回复
赞成取消补贴!
回复
x
x