评论列表
  1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 全球 /
  3. 加拿大视中俄为威胁 欲购买65架F-35 /
  4. 全部评论 /

加拿大视中俄为威胁 欲购买65架F-35

阅读全文
我看哈珀挺能花钱的,金融危机到来之前就把库存花光了,如今和平时期给一家军火商就扔160亿,是目前F-35项目的所有参加伙伴盟国中最大手笔,办G20也是全世界最大手笔,费用从最初预算一亿上升到十几个亿。。。。 在哈珀的“小政府”,钱是用来烧的。
回复
Canada has an important role to play in defending North American security. As long as China remains an undemocratic nation, it will continue to be perceived as a threat to the security of the rest of world, including US and Canada. I support this purchase.
回复
The government of Canada should buy weapons from CHINA to protect land of Canada. do you understand guys???
回复
有些王八蛋这是奇怪,什么事情都能联系上中国。
回复
中国除了导弹,常规军应没有构成威胁。 北冰洋,将是最会出现冲突的地区。
回复
Lockheed-Martin公司的F-35是个典型的“钓鱼工程”,会不会成为一个“烂尾工程”还很难说。原来预想的是最大特点之一是价格便宜,与F-22形成高低搭配。但是洛克希德-马丁公司管理不善,结果是研制费用不断增加,工期不断后拖,价格不断攀升,已经让世界各国为之望而却步。英国作为第一盟国,在新首相卡麦龙上台之后已经表示要缩减国防预算,对F35的性能和价格表示担忧,表示花不起那么多钱。 在世界各国都不愿意对F-35做出承诺的时候,唯独只有哈珀政府愿意成为冤大头,成为F-35成品飞机的第一个承诺买家。一下子砸出去纳税人的160亿。 问题是,现在加拿大仍然处于金融危机之后的恢复期,政府依然承担着有史以来最大的财政赤字,其二加拿大本土现在已经有几十年没有明显战争威胁之下,为什么偏偏在这个节骨眼上要烧钱?其三,加国军人现在遭受的最大威胁,肯定不是来自空中,为什么偏偏在此时要花大钱给空军烧? 有很大可能,哈珀要把加拿大纳税人成为拯救F35烂尾工程的冤大头。
回复
該戰機是由Lockheed公司製造,如果沒利潤,Lockheed會買出該戰機嗎. 有些國家不買,原因買出後,會損害美國更大利益.
回复
问题是加拿大是否能找出足够数量的战斗机驾驶员?那可不是挺大肚子满街晃的警察!
回复
You look like a child to see this question. I won't say anything about you...
回复
"The media have criticized the aircraft as being too short-ranged and far too complex for Canada's needs. Michael Byers, Canada Research Chair in Global Politics and International Law at the University of British Columbia characterized the purchase of the F-35 as a "pig in a poke" and stated that it is too expensive, short-ranged and unneeded" 資料取自維基. 有評論指出:單引擎機不大適合加拿大北部寒冷天氣,應採用Multi-engine.
回复
65架戰機,如包括日後的維修保養費,總值若160billion加元,美國又白白賺一筆. 這些戰機跟本起不到什麼抗衡俄羅斯或中國(中國和加拿大雙方邊界距離很遠,彼此根本毫無關聯). 事實是彼美國作了一筆,啞子吃黃連,還要說些廢話.
回复
You have no clue of what national defense means, do you? Sometimes it means preemptive strike. "中國和加拿大雙方邊界距離很遠": you think only because of the threat from China or Russia just because some media said so? "美國又白白賺一筆": lots of countries want F35 or lower with even higher prices, you think US will profit from these countries?
回复
You have no clue of what national defense means, do you? Sometimes it means preemptive strike. "中國和加拿大雙方邊界距離很遠": you think only because of the threat from China or Russia just because some media said so? "美國又白白賺一筆": lots of countries want F35 or lower with even higher prices, you think US will profit from these countries?
回复
I C. Do you want to the government of Canada buy weapons from the government of China? that's bullshit. China is far from Canada, what about Russia? Think about it...
回复
展开 1 条回复
真是个傻比,有病!!!
回复
x
x