人权归人权，其实，教育孩子，还是有一些其他方法，例如：
Errorless learning
from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Errorless_learning
Errorless learning is a procedure introduced by Herbert Terrace (1963) which allows discrimination learning to occur with few or even with no responses to the negative stimulus (abbreviated S-). A negative stimulus is a stimulus associated with undesirable consequences (e.g., absence of reinforcement). In discrimination learning, an error is a response to the S-, and according to Terrace errors are not required for successful discrimination performance.
A simple discrimination learning procedure is one in which a subject learns to associate one stimulus, S+ (positive stimulus), with reinforcement (e.g. food) and another, S- (negative stimulus), with extinction (e.g. absence of food). For example, a pigeon can learn to peck a red key (S+), and avoid a green key (S-). Using traditional procedures, a pigeon would be initially trained to peck a red key (S+). When the pigeon was responding consistently to the red key (S+), a green key (S-) would be introduced. At first the pigeon would also respond to the green key (S+) but gradually responses to this key would decrease, because they are not followed by food, so that they occurred only a few times or even never.
Terrace (1963) found that discrimination learning could occur without errors when the training begins early in operant conditioning and visual stimuli (S+ and S-) like colors are used that differ in terms of brightness, duration and wavelength. He used a fading procedure in which the brightness and duration differences between the S+ and the S- were decreased progressively leaving only the difference in wavelength. In other words, the S+ and S- were initially presented with different brightness and duration, i.e., the S+ would appear during 5 s and fully red, and the S- would appear during 0.5 s and dark. Gradually, over successive presentations, the duration of the S- and its brightness were gradually increased until the keylight was fully green during 5 s.
The errorless learning procedure is highly effective in reducing the number of responses to the S- during training. In Terrace’s (1963) experiment, subjects trained with the conventional discrimination procedure averaged over 3000 S- (errors) responses during 28 sessions of training; whereas subjects trained with the errorless procedure averaged only 25 S- (errors) responses in the same number of sessions.
Later, Terrace (1972) claimed not only that the errorless learning procedure improves long-term discrimination performance, but also that: 1) S- does not become aversive and so does not elicit "aggressive" behaviors, as it often does with conventional training; 2) S- does not develop inhibitory properties; 3) positive behavioral contrast to S+ does not occur. In other words, Terrace has claimed that the "by-products" of conventional discrimination learning do not occur with the errorless procedure.
However, some evidence suggests that errorless learning may not be as qualitatively different from conventional training as Terrace initially claimed. For example, Rilling (1977) demonstrated in a series of experiments that these "by-products" can occur after errorless learning, but that their effects may not be as large as in the conventional procedure; and Marsh and Johnson (1968) found that subjects given errorless training were very slow to make a discrimination reversal.
Interest from psychologists studying basic research on declined after the 1970’s. However, errorless learning attracted the interest of researchers in applied psychology, and studies have been conducted with both children (e.g., educational settings) and adults (e.g. Parkinson’s patients).
比起华人，其他族裔的人更知道团结抗争。
而华人，我们看见的只是一个个华人的利益被侵害；一个个家庭被破坏；一出出悲剧不断上演。
中国人为什么易被加拿大法律伤害，因为中国人相信正义，相信道德。而加拿大的警察，检控官不是缺德，而是完全没有道德，完全鄙视孔孟之道。当中国人试图讲一些道德的时候，他们会记下你说的每一句话，从中寻找它们可以使用的证据。他们不会对你有任何同情。他们不会愿意到嘴边的肉跑掉．
这里不是一个追求正义的社会．这里是一个完全的商品社会．如果你在他手里，你就是他的商品，他会根据你的可利用价值，和投入产出比，来决定对你采取怎样的行动。
西方文化从来是弱肉强食。从他们在非洲，美洲，亚洲对待当地人的暴行，到他们自己之间的互相残杀无不应证这点。使用国家暴力来处理家庭纠纷充分说明了这点。
为了表示以强凌弱有理，他们最常说的是，you are the loser. 言外之意就是 I am the winner. 他们认为这是天经地义的。他们才不管别人的死活。看看他们在伊拉克的作为吧
。他们在阿富汗大兵的帽子上写着 we do bad things to bad guy 但是多少无辜的人死在他们的手下。多少家庭妻离子散，家破人亡。他们有过同情吗？他们有的只是，找一个人或团体做替罪羊，说他应承担责任。至于他们自己杀死十个人是因为别人杀了一个人，他们是为了维护和平去的。这就是他们的典型逻辑，用来掩盖他们那些路人皆知的战略目的
。
在这里，警察和控方律师的目的无非是想多赢一个案子，他们才不会管你事实是咋样，他们只根据赢率决定是否起诉，赢率的重要一条就是对方是否弱小，对方是否有钱，能请的动大律师。
尊老爱幼，除暴安良，以德报怨，严于律己，宽以待人，以教育挽救帮助为主。这些中国文化中可以经常发现的词语，在西方文化中很难找到。许多人可能自踏出国门后就再也没有听到过这些。西方文化本质就是追求不择手段成为胜利者的文化。他们的文化是缺乏道德的。如果你听到他们谈道德，那只是他们想使用的一件武器而已。他们知道这件武器对中国人特别有效，因为中国人最相信道德，最受道德约束。
-------------------------------------------
子不教，父子过，教不严，师之惰。
Spare the rod, spoil the child
As the Bible tells us: "He who spareth the rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him correcteth him betimes" (Proverbs 13:24) and "Withhold not correction from a child: for if thou strike him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and deliver his soul from hell." (Proverbs 23:13-14)
You are right!
加拿大的司法系统有非常大的缺陷。
在这里，社会正义不是司法系统的职责，而是立法部门的职责。
司法系统只是按照立法部门设计的程序走完司法过程而已。
司法程序是由控方律师和辨方律师斗嘴，若控方律师能让法官或陪审团相信有一条法律条文可以用，他就赢了。控方律师赢得的官司数量和他自己的职业前途有很大关系。他会不择手段地争取多赢官司。赢容易的官司。什么官司容易？有关穷人的官司。法律知识少的人的官司。外来移民的官司。易被人欺负的，缺乏自我保护能力的人的官司。相信现在警察们，检控官们都已清楚华人是他们最容易获得的猎物，和最容易让他们得到更多纳税人血汗的借口，他们不会轻易放弃。是他们造成的许多社会不公，是他们造成了更多的社会仇恨，是他们造成了更高的犯罪率。
在很多情况下，法律的原意和司法遇到的问题有很大区别。法律的使用对社会并不见得有正面效果。有些法律是几十年，上百年前制定的，当时的情况与现在有很大区别。即使是新制定的法律也有可能有缺陷。因为法律是人造的。就像Microsoft Windows是人造的，他们常常发布更新。汽车是人造的，他们常常召回零件。法律缺陷的更新，极为困难，他还和利益集团的利益，和政治有关。以至基本不可能有效纠正法律的缺陷。
西方自由世界的司法系统只不过是多数人对少数人的暴政。使用多数人在强大媒体洗脑后选出的极少数议员的想法(opinion)而非科学制造法律残酷对待少数人，造成社会不公比比皆是，这就是美国监狱人满为患的原因。
比起华人，其他族裔的人更知道团结抗争。
而华人，我们看见的只是一个个华人的利益被侵害；一个个家庭被破坏；一出出悲剧不断上演。
中国人为什么易被加拿大法律伤害，因为中国人相信正义，相信道德。而加拿大的警察，检控官不是缺德，而是完全没有道德，完全鄙视孔孟之道。当中国人试图讲一些道德的时候，他们会记下你说的每一句话，从中寻找它们可以使用的证据。他们不会对你有任何同情。他们不会愿意到嘴边的肉跑掉．
这里不是一个追求正义的社会．这里是一个完全的商品社会．如果你在他手里，你就是他的商品，他会根据你的可利用价值，和投入产出比，来决定对你采取怎样的行动。
西方文化从来是弱肉强食。从他们在非洲，美洲，亚洲对待当地人的暴行，到他们自己之间的互相残杀无不应证这点。使用国家暴力来处理家庭纠纷充分说明了这点。
为了表示以强凌弱有理，他们最常说的是，you are the loser. 言外之意就是 I am the winner. 他们认为这是天经地义的。他们才不管别人的死活。看看他们在伊拉克的作为吧
。他们在阿富汗大兵的帽子上写着 we do bad things to bad guy 但是多少无辜的人死在他们的手下。多少家庭妻离子散，家破人亡。他们有过同情吗？他们有的只是，找一个人或团体做替罪羊，说他应承担责任。至于他们自己杀死十个人是因为别人杀了一个人，他们是为了维护和平去的。这就是他们的典型逻辑，用来掩盖他们那些路人皆知的战略目的
。
在这里，警察和控方律师的目的无非是想多赢一个案子，他们才不会管你事实是咋样，他们只根据赢率决定是否起诉，赢率的重要一条就是对方是否弱小，对方是否有钱，能请的动大律师。
尊老爱幼，除暴安良，以德报怨，严于律己，宽以待人，以教育挽救帮助为主。这些中国文化中可以经常发现的词语，在西方文化中很难找到。许多人可能自踏出国门后就再也没有听到过这些。西方文化本质就是追求不择手段成为胜利者的文化。他们的文化是缺乏道德的。如果你听到他们谈道德，那只是他们想使用的一件武器而已。他们知道这件武器对中国人特别有效，因为中国人最相信道德，最受道德约束。
-------------------------------------------
子不教，父子过，教不严，师之惰。
Spare the rod, spoil the child
As the Bible tells us: "He who spareth the rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him correcteth him betimes" (Proverbs 13:24) and "Withhold not correction from a child: for if thou strike him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and deliver his soul from hell." (Proverbs 23:13-14)
儿童保护法律趋严 华人父母犯案上升