评论列表
  1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 本地 /
  3. 男子保卫女友母亲刺伤入室贼或被判14年 /
  4. 全部评论 /

男子保卫女友母亲刺伤入室贼或被判14年

阅读全文
🤩👿
回复
谁遇到这事都难以把握,判刑要充分考虑情节!
回复
要更好地了解加拿大的法律,建议大家参考“加拿大华语法律资讯网”(www.canadalawcn.com)。这是一个新网站。
回复
犯罪天堂,实至名归! 罪犯有人权,是不错,不过当他潜入别人家的时候,他就没把自己当人! 在楼外刺伤,又怎么样?谁知道小偷跑到楼外去干什么?如果他跑去取枪哪? 所以小偷跑到楼外并不代表他没有威胁了。这个逻辑是不成立的。既然小偷还有威胁,公民就有权利保护自己。坚决支持公民保护自己的财产!!!
回复
犯罪天堂,实至名归! 罪犯有人权,是不错,不过当他潜入别人家的时候,他就没把自己当人! 在楼外刺伤,又怎么样?谁知道小偷跑到楼外去干什么?如果他跑去取枪哪? 所以小偷跑到楼外并不代表他没有威胁了。这个逻辑是不成立的。既然小偷还有威胁,公民就有权利保护自己。坚决支持公民保护自己的财产!!!
回复
这位准女婿正是荷尔蒙旺盛的时候,估计是想在未来的丈母娘前表现一下,这种情况下做出一些过当的举动是有可能的。
回复
同意#57和“大后天”的观点,情绪不能取代法律,法律也不是依据单方面的情绪和立场而制定的。
回复
说的太对了。加拿大不是美国,加拿大是傻逼。加拿大没有common sense,只有rare sense.
回复
关注这个案件的进展,但我个人觉得,不知屋主是否有问那人在屋里是否是干什么的,很简单,讲普通话的应当是大陆移民的,试想想,当你在中国大陆时,有陌生人在你的家里时,你会怎么做,肯定是先问:你是谁???你是干什么的之类的。但从该篇新闻中无法看出,屋主是否有问那个陌生人在屋里是干什么的???我觉得该案件应当不会象“陈旺”案那样简单的,因为对于陈旺,那个盗贼明显已经偷了他的东西。而此人只是非法进入屋主的房屋(警方也已起控他),如果是在不明对方是干嘛的情况下就对对方进行攻击,我觉得,很明显,这个自卫的说法就不过去,而且从新闻中可以看出,在博斗过程中,“盗贼”(我暂且先用这两个字,因为从新闻中看不出那个人在那个屋是干什么的)最后可以跑了,但屋主可能仍然追出攻击,很显然,屋主有侵略攻击的意识与行为。当然,屋主的命运则要看最后那个“盗贼”如何解释了,如果最终那个并不是盗贼的话,那么屋主可能无法拖逃控罪的可能;如果最终法庭确认那个是盗贼,那么将有可能会另外考虑(但这并不代表他,屋主一定无罪),以上是个人的认为与言论,与任何无关。
回复
一个陌生人藏匿在你家,你不会认为他是来做客的吧?或是走错门了?
回复
下次让这个盗贼去你家里做客吧,祝你好运
回复
看来要理解加拿大的行为跟法律,法律告诉你小偷来偷东西,你要配合好小偷,把该给他的都给他,什么珠宝. 现金. 名牌. 银行卡(还要写好银行卡的密码,以备小偷忘记了),还提醒大家,现在天气热,小偷进来要穿好外套,否则小偷强奸你法官会说你穿的太性感了。深感这个民主国家的优越性,可以进商场,住家,银行去拿东西去拿钱!出现伤害还是小偷最优越。以后要这样教育下一代了,告诉孩子们,没有吃的去超市拿,没有钱用去银行拿,没有人敢伤害你,谁伤害你就要判他几十年的。你的理由就是,是超市东西太多在诱惑你,银行钱很多看到后被诱惑了,这样你什么罪都没有的,哇哈哈!真爽!爽...........................
回复
这是很好的普法教材啊
回复
看来加拿大的警察,他们不是保护良民百姓的,而是罪犯的保姆!!!
回复
楼上说加拿大法律脑残的,我能理解。不过你们法律知识都太浅了,这件事和以往大家评论的很多事(ie.李伟光精神病无罪)其实都是全世界通用的。中国的法律也是如此,全球大部分国家的法律也是如此。你们看待事情还太片面。 不信的可以在baidu上随便搜家国内律师行,加上qq免费咨询下就知道了。
回复
群情激昂,却是一群法盲。小偷是有罪,但是轮不到你来惩罚他,否则要司法机关干嘛。如果此人追到外面多次刺伤盗贼,不说是故意伤人,也是防卫过当。前些天51登过一个国内的案例,亲生父亲企图强奸自己的女儿,其妻子愤而用刀将其砍死,检查机关起诉她防卫过当故意杀人,因为在此禽兽父亲已无伤害她们娘俩的能力的前提下,她不应该继续攻击他。也许最后陪审团会判她无罪,但是作为公诉机关,如果不起诉她,那就是失职。这个案中的警察也是一样的,他们没有权力决定当事人是否无罪,否则就会跟国内JC一样,一手遮天了。
回复
这么多评论中,感觉就这个说得比较靠谱,中肯。 涉及到人的生命安全,法律必须小心谨慎。对正当防卫予以严格界定,不是要简单地“保卫罪犯的人权”,更重要的是要防止宽松或界定不严的法律被某些人利用,将来成为迫害他人的手段(比如将某人骗入自己的房屋,然后以“正当防卫”的名义将其杀害)。
回复
加拿大的法律经常是保护坏人的,加拿大的司法应该改变,警察应该裁减。
回复
好吃懒做的警察,黑白颠倒的法律!这就是狗屁加拿大!
回复
FUCKING TORONTO POLICE! FUCKING CANADA LAW!
回复
不知此时此刻有入他室习惯的人看了51坛子是否乐不可支了?😁
回复
什么时间开庭, 咱老中也一块去给西人捧捧场.
回复
看看新闻,最近警察开枪打死了好几个人,是否都是正当防卫腻? 如果当时时警察赶来了,在门外打死了匪徒,会控告COP吗?100%不会的,COP的说法会有很多,警察可以打死他,你不行,原因在于他是警察, 警察只不过是受过6个月培训的普通人. 这就是不平等.
回复
当然不平等,就算他一天训练也没受过,只有穿上警服就可以给你戴手铐,你拷个警察试试?
回复
从目前披露的信息,如果我是陪审团一员,我会这样判断: 正当防卫始于室内。。盗贼没有求饶。。缠斗得难解难分。。盗贼且战且退到室外(防止人家女友背后袭击),伺机制服对手。。男友看到困兽犹斗。。情急之下。。发生了这似乎过当的结局。。 关键的关键,是盗贼即使不想服法,也应该望风披靡的逃跑。。。但我没看到有这报导。
回复
Usually the criminals have more rights than other people; otherwise, police and lawyers will have a lot less things to do and may face unemployment. Many years ago, a small town (cannot remember the name but it is near San Francico) had so many crimes and the mayor finally passed a law that every home must have a gun. The crime rate dropped a lot.
回复
不能简单化,如果盗贼逃出房子之后,是要去车里拿武器再来发难,那打他一棍也未尝不可。
回复
美国的那个案例是罪犯在逃跑的时候转头并手伸进口袋里掏东西。屋主当时以为他在掏枪所以就一棍打上去把他打死了,结果发现罪犯当时只不过是在掏偷来的房主的钱包而已。
回复
回复 hypertherm:哈哈,掏钱包!?
回复
那也得等他拿了武器回过头来以后再当头一棒,这样才合法。 或者也像其他电影里描写的一样,一棒打死后再往他手里塞把枪。
回复
展开 4 条回复
这个案件和美国一个电影差不多(应该是真实故事改编的)。 美国那个电影是房主追逐盗贼到房前的草坪上的时候用棒球棒击了下盗贼后脑,导致盗贼死亡。结果房主被判了二级谋杀还是过失杀人。 这个在国内法律也是如此。如果人已经跑了(也就是他不再对你构成威胁了)你再继续追逐并打伤或打死此人之后你是要付刑事责任的。 我相信楼上很多人并没有仔细看新闻,当时盗贼是已经逃出房子之后被房主刺伤的。这件事不能怪加拿大法律,世界上大部分国家都是如此。毕竟盗贼当时已经不对你构成威胁了,再刺伤对方是绝对不属于自卫的。
回复
盗贼首先侵犯了别人的人权,不给他点厉害他下次会更猖狂,这社会不就乱了。 非常支持和敬佩自慰者的勇敢行为。 如果你感到有危险,一定要反抗,主动出击,不然被害了就晚了。
回复
不好意思, 是自卫者.
回复
回复 法官:有啥不好意思的,夜晚一时疏忽,又不是说你自慰😁
回复
盼着有个贼,也偷偷这警察家,看看结果会怎样?😝 法官大人,您经手的case就没有一起是小偷偷警察的吗?😁
回复
幽默嘛. 最好是小偷偷了那些拼命保护宽容罪犯的自由党/NDP政客的家, 让他们尝尝保护私有财产犯法的滋味.
回复
TORONTO — A Toronto man escorting his girlfriend to her home Sunday night discovered signs of entry to her house and, fearing for the woman's mother sleeping inside, searched for intruders. A man was found hiding, Toronto police said. An ensuing struggle left the intruder bleeding from stab wounds. As frightening as the incident was, it is the charging of the boyfriend with aggravated assault, punishable by 14 years in prison, that makes the case stand out in a clutter of urban crime. It is the latest flashpoint in the debate over self-defence and protection of property after a number of high-profile cases across Canada brought a clamour for clarity and change. Defence lawyers said on Tuesday it's the sort of case that a defendant — the 28-year-old man charged with the stabbing — would want to be decided by a jury, where citizens can imagine themselves in a similar circumstance and ponder what they might do. "You can defend your property, you can defend persons in your charge and you can defend yourself. In this case he can make an argument to all three, but he has to use proportional force," said Gordon Dykstra, a criminal defence attorney in Abbotsford, B.C. "I think if he gets in front of a jury and he's halfway presentable, if he doesn't have a criminal record and makes a good case for what happened, a jury will acquit him." But Toronto police suggest this might not be a perfect example for champions of self-defence rights. "The man was charged because it is alleged the stabbing was excessive," said Const. Tony Vella. "It is alleged that he stabbed the man a number of times. He's fortunate to be alive." Key to the case is that the multiple stab wounds were inflicted both inside the home and outside, Vella said, suggesting the occupants might have been able to close the door once he was outside and call police. The scene of the incident was Parson Court, a pleasant street in west Toronto filled with large homes. The 32-year-old man who was stabbed was charged with break and enter. Neither accused could be reached for comment. Recent self-defence cases have not gone well for prosecutors. Last month, Lawrence Manzer, of Burton, N.B., had a mistrial declared in charges stemming from a confrontation with intruders on his neighbour's property. Sloppy paperwork was cited as the reason. The same month Kim Walker, a Yorkton, Sask., welder, was sentenced to eight years after a jury declined to find him guilty of murder for killing his daughter's boyfriend whom he deemed to be destroying his drug-addicted 16-year-old daughter. He was found guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter. In May, Joseph Singleton, 46, a farmer in Taber, Alta., had his charges — for assault with a weapon and assault causing bodily harm, after he wounded a man who had just burgled his house with the blunt end of a hatchet — referred to an alternative measures program. In March, prosecutors dropped gun charges against Ian Thomson, 53, of Port Colborne, Ont., who shot at three masked men caught firebombing his home while one yelled: "Are you ready to die?" The Crown said there was no reasonable prospect of conviction. And last October, David Chen, a Toronto grocer in Chinatown became a celebrity when he was acquitted of charges after he tied up a repeat shoplifter in a citizen's arrest. Peter Lindsay, who represented Chen, said the public is galvanized by such stories. "The courts have repeatedly said the self-defence sections of the Criminal Code are incredibly complicated. The provisions are really complex and are in need of an overhaul to simplify them," said Lindsay. "For the public to have confidence in the system, it is important for the system to be sympathetic to the victims of crime and understand to some degree who is the good guy and who is the bad guy. "But that has to be balanced. You don't have a right to just attack someone because they broke into your house. This is not the U.S.A. where your home is your castle and you have carte blanche once an intruder is inside your house." Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced changes to the Criminal Code that would broaden the citizen's arrest and self-defence laws but the amendments died with the dissolution of Parliament prior to the May election. The bill will again be put forward this fall. "We do intend to reintroduce that change this fall and get it passed as soon as possible," said Andrew Bernardo, spokesman for Justice Minister Rob Nicholson. National Post ? Copyright ☕️ National Post
回复
把那负责此案的警察裁了先。
回复
把那负责此案的警察裁了先。
回复
把那负责此案的警察裁了先。
回复
加载更多
x
x