稍微有点智力的人就不难看出你狡辩的三个谬误：
首先，这场讨论是工会的合同、不是福特的合同（还没轮到他腻），所以福特的工资和本话题无关。
第二，我问的是 你 是否同意你的工资和私营企业的同类工资看齐。你不敢回答（因为我的问题是理性的问题）、却反问 我 是否同意 福特 的工资向加航CEO看齐。我 怎么看 福特 的工资和 你 的工资有个（那神马味儿）关系。
第三，福特的工资低于加航CEO的工资（对不？）。现在我说了，＂福特的工资应该低于加航CEO的工资＂。同样的逻辑，你的工资是否应该低于私营企业的工资呀？
您的"技术含量" 或者 "逻辑"在哪儿呀？
First, the discussion is about public unions contract, not Ford's (and he will have his turn in several years), how much Ford get paid is irrelevant.
second, I asked you if YOU agree to get paid as same level as similar jobs in private sector. Instead of giving a straight answer, you responded with an irrelevant question asking me if I agree about Ford's pay (you still don't see the silliness, do you?).
Third, Ford (a mayor of public)'s pay is way below AC's CEO (agreed?). Back to your question "如果市府付给市长的总支出（工资、福利、退休金）和加航的CEO相当，你答应吗". No, my answer is that I want Ford's pay is below the pay of AC's CEO. Now what you say? Take the contract with your pay below private sector?
Tell me where is your "技术含量" OR "逻辑".
NOTE: I am in my lunch break and I do not have a Chinese typing software in office.
回复
kernelcore
2012-01-17 14:51
举报
0
OK, let me try and see if I can help clear your nut brain.
You ask me if I agree to that public union should get paid the same level as similar jobs in private sector.
If you believe it should be, then why should not the management get similar pay as private sector, which means the mayor or City manager should get millions of bucks.
Unfortunately, you already said, you don't agree with the latter.
So your point is while union should be matched to the private sectors ( because they pay lower ) the mayor and city manager should be matched to the public sectors, and this is also because they paid lower.
And you feel pretty comfortable with this double standard.
What a capitalism brain!
And now you see the silliness is on which side!
辛峰：福特单挑三大工会 你支持谁？