估计文章里的ziranzhizi就是江建丽或者其它在里面工作的华人吧？劝你们一句这种生孩子没屁眼的工作还是不要做，会有报应的。安省各种按人收钱的政府服务多了去了，为什么只有CAS引起这么大的争议，被这么多人所批判，鄙视？看看维基百科里CAS的这段介绍：
Powerful As God, a 2011 film focusing on the first hand experiences of 26 individuals who witnessed the social devastation caused by Ontario CAS in recent years. This documentary reveals a hidden world of corruption, power hunger and incompetence that has been hidden from the scrutiny of the public eye for many decades. This award winning film was produced and published by the Documentary Media (MFA) Program, Ryerson University and can be viewed online.
有兴趣的可以到这个网站看看这部记录片：http://www.blakout.ca/htm/viewthedoc.php#.VSSeLdzIWGc，现在不只有图有真相，连电影都出来了，毋庸置疑CAS就是一失败的社会福利系统。我们现在能做的：
1、有机会见到选区省议员的时候，当面反映，把社会上对CAS的负面意见反映给他们，告诉他们，改革CAS一定可以为他们拉来不少选票。
2、有身边的真实案例发到http://www.blakout.ca/这个网站上，上面那位妈妈可以考虑把故事发上去，如果觉得英文不好，私信本人，我可以帮忙翻译。如果有谁知道Rolia那位自杀妈妈的故事，也可以发到这上面，这是目前我们向主流社会发声的一个较为简单有效的渠道。
3、帮助宣传这部记录片，把链接http://www.blakout.ca/htm/viewthedoc.php#.VSSeLdzIWGc发到自己能接触到的论坛、网站。
解决社会问题从我做起、随手做起！
Barbara Kay: The problem with Children’s Aid Societies
The problem with Children’s Aid Societies
A young friend of mine took her bruised toddler to the hospital as a precaution after a fall down some stairs. All was well, but she nervously joked, “I was afraid the doctor might call the CAS (Children’s Aid Society).” This shocked me. Decades ago, I took my kids to the hospital on more than one similar occasion, but I never entertained such a misgiving.
My friend’s fears are not unfounded. Had the doctor felt suspicious, she might have called the CAS, which would then make inquiries and checked the parents’ records. In extreme situations, the CAS could theoretically seize the child, forcing the parents into costly litigation to get back access to their child.
In fact, the CAS has more powers than virtually any other government agency. A CAS worker (who may or may not be a registered social worker; many allegedly are not) can enter a home without a warrant in some circumstances; apprehend a child or children without what most Canadians would consider due process; interview a child with no advocate present under some circumstances; ask police to enforce apprehensions against their own judgment; order a child to be medicated over the wishes of parents; and punish parents who resist by denying access or, in some cases, permanent custody.
Canadian CAS workers intervene in about 200,000 kids’ lives a year. And it isn’t just the poor and marginalized who become CAS “clients.” A few years ago, for example, an Ontario maid service worker felt an upscale client’s house didn’t meet her standard of house pride; shortly after, a CAS worker showed up.
Children have been seized from Christian parents who don’t spare “the rod” in disciplining (one family had seven children removed), or whom the parents persisted in homeschooling in a manner that CAS officials declared unacceptable.
In other cases, demonstrably maltreated children are inexplicably left with parents or foster parents known to be dangerous, and sometimes end up injured or even dead. In these latter cases, we read their horror stories with incredulity in Christie Blatchford’s columns.
In a National Post feature article in June 2009, Kevin Libin portrayed an industry in which abuses are all too common. One source, a professor of social work, claims that a shocking 15%-20% of children under CAS oversight suffer injury or neglect. Several CAS insiders whom Libin interviewed regard the situation as systemically hopeless. A clinical psychologist with decades of experience advocating for children said, “I would love to just demolish the system and start from scratch again.”
There are four general reasons that the system arguably does deserve to be “demolished” — unaccountability, secrecy, money and a lack of political will:
With virtually no checks and balances, case workers have “as much power as God,” in the words of one former social worker. And they use it according to their diverse subjective impulses;
Children in care have little voice. CAS actions often are shrouded in secrecy, and media investigations are chilled by CAS lawyers, who claim to be protecting the privacy rights of all involved. Children in foster and group care typically do not have adequate access to the Office of the Children’s Lawyer. Too often, “confidentiality” protects the powerful, not the vulnerable.
CASs are funded per capita. This creates a financial incentive for taking children into care. CASs receive extra funding for children diagnosed with conditions requiring medication — a fact that creates other unhealthy incentives.
CAS workers typically cannot be sued if they have acted in “good faith.” But bad faith is notoriously difficult to prove. Ombudsmen have the power to look at secret files, but in Ontario the ombudsman can only recommend changes, not actively intervene. Two recent attempts by NDP provincial legislators to pass a bill giving the ombudsman oversight teeth have failed: one voted down by Ontario’s then-majority Liberals, one dying in a prorogued parliament.
What is to be done?
Next week, I will review a 2011 documentary film on this subject, made by a former foster parent. Powerful as God is a movie that Ontario family-service agencies would prefer you don’t see, but robust attempts to shut it down have failed.
Powerful as God can be found at blakout.ca. Featured in the film is a proposal for an alternative system of child protection that I find both sensible and viable. It is proposed by Canadians whose tragic history has rendered them all too familiar with the iniquities associated with what they regard as state-sanctioned child “kidnapping.”
National Post
回复
发财了我就去旅游
2015-04-16 21:54
举报
0
世界上有恶人不奇怪。但是恶人为所欲为还受法律保护，这才是最大的问题。我们期望社会是公平的。
回复
richie
2015-04-16 20:53
举报
0
Children’s Aid Class Action是怎么回事，有谁知道？
http://www.kmlaw.ca/ocwclassaction
回复
mytrial
2015-04-13 23:18
举报
0
Don't trust CAS, they are not helping you, they are your worse nightmare, they are worse than mafia, they drug your kids for money, turn you kids to sex slaves.
6岁男童被害：CAS是救星还是黑社会？