评论列表
  1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 本地 /
  3. 响应联国要求3党抢票 各提出新难民政策 /
  4. 全部评论 /

响应联国要求3党抢票 各提出新难民政策

阅读全文
那个党少接受难民, 我就选哪个党
回复
同意!可惜没有不接收难民的党。
回复
站着说话不腰疼,当好人谁都能当,但你要知道你钱包里有多少钱。如果让难民住你家里或你拿出工资的一定比例来资助难民,如果你能这么做,我从心里佩服你。
回复
哪个党首把自己的财产捐出来帮助难民,我就投哪个党的票
回复
美国的介入,让叙利亚陷入内战,产生大量难民,美国首先对此负责,美国打算接受难民了吗??另外,叙利亚难民都是穆斯林,他们及其后代是恐怖分子产生的温床,加拿大不必要那么积极去安置。
回复
你支持的,NDP,自由党争先恐后地要接受,比着看谁接受的多,咋办呢? 楼下的悠悠,你玩啥里格楞啊,省选市选时,你讲要选自由党,联邦选保守党,联邦大选时,你讲要选自由党,省选,市选选保守党,小儿科吗。
回复
中东的乱局是美国和西方政府介入的结果。。。。是花花革命的结果, 他们应该对此负责, 而不是中国, 中国何罪之有? 这个难民问题已经不是人道的问题, 而是造事者必须负责的问题, OK!
回复
加拿大有白求恩,中国有赖昌星。人类社会的根本问题是由于人道和对人的关爱已不具有任何普世价值,金钱至于一切之上。而我喜欢加拿大,正是由于它更人道,博爱和宽容,应该感恩加拿大让我们来到这里。
回复
波士顿爆炸案的主凶就是难民。 我只愿意加拿大出钱资助土耳其和保加利亚等国安置叙利亚难民。
回复
人道主义一定要量力而行
回复
说得多好啊
回复
What europe is facing is the bitter fruit of their own seeds of anarchy .Western leaders along with US have been trying to destabilize muslim countries to control their wealth of oil by over throwing their leaders in the name of fake democracy. West and US provided arms and other means to those so called rebels in the muslim world ,as a result millions of people are died and displaced from their home land. These innocent people have no choice other than to save them from those rebellion groups. We should not blame these immigrants or neihgbouring muslim countries. We must Look into our own policies which we have adapted for past 4- 5 decades .
回复
They're not migrants. They are invaders. They have no place in Germany or the EU. You can read all the sob-stories you want. That 37-year-old shopkeeper? He didn't move to another part of Syria. He's looking for free handouts. And he, like the millions that are waiting to come over, are not real refugees. They are Muslims colonizing Europe. Don't believe me? Count how many Syrian Christians there are among the refugees. You won't find many because they're being massacred. Germany is not the promised land. Germany cannot refuse the migrants because liberals like Yahoo will think that they're just another batch of Nazis. "Volunteer groups have sprung up to help asylum seekers find permanent housing and jobs, and to receive free German language lessons. German media estimate this year's expected bill." - Wow. And in five years, how many of these foreigners will speak the language, have jobs, and respect the laws? Answer: none of them. They will leech off welfare. They will rape the women. They will declare no-go zones just like Sweden. These are not teary eyed asylum seekers. They are invaders fleeing from violence they created. And guess what? Those 'neo-Nazis' are right: they have no right being there, and they should rightfully be deported. You're going to see more of those 'neo-Nazis' because they're going to be the ones protecting their people, not the Tolerant Left. Look past the teary-eyed liberal stories and you'll see darker motives. Why don't these asylum seekers move to other Arab states? Oh, right: they want the West, and only the West. So, how many layers of human excrement did they have to wipe off the train tracks? How many more Mullahs are going to pop up?
回复
I am filled with dread and forboreding at the medium to long-term implications of this islamic migration to the West. At the moment the instinct is to help the seemingly needy and helpless people, but what about the hereafter? Something that strikes me about these supposed migrants is their entitled and aggressive attitudes. What makes them believe that the West owes them anything, that they are entitled as of right, to swarm into other countries' sovereign territories? Would they be that accommodating if the tables were turned? Is this attitude not a sobering iwarning about what to expect in the near future? I wonder if the West understands what has hit it? Islam is not known to be very acommodating of other beliefs, and is generally not a gentle, or liberal religion as all the world-wide events in the past year especially have shown. WIll they integrate? Are they pre-disposed to be law-abiding? Are the countries prepared with foresighted legialation that perhaps allows them limited stay for a couple of years until their countires return to stability? I would think that that would be a safe measure. What will happen in 3- 5 years when they are all settled? Let me hazard a guess: the demands will start; insistence on mosques to be built, demands for sharia laws, and insistence on continuing their ways of life in total disdain for that of their hosts. Hungary has rightly defended its refusal to acomodate more than a minimum by saying that it is protecting its culture and predominantly Christian religion from a swarm of islamists. I say, kudos to them; they are seeing more clearly than the other EU countries are. I think that the face of Eruope will change significantly in the coming years. Time will tell.
回复
看了看西人网站,这次几乎是一面倒地反对接受这些宗教移民,质问他们为什么不移民海湾石油富国。 Qur’an:9:5 - “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.” Qur’an:8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.” Qur’an:8:39 “So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief ) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).” Qur’an:9:123 “Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.” Yeah lets bring all of them here... The effects will be seen by our children, when they are forced to wear hijabs and pray to Allah.. Oh and what's the punishment for leaving Islam? Death...
回复
美国也接受,但只是向叙利亚难民提供 temporary asylum,这就意味作一旦叙利亚停战,他们要回去。而且人数远低于小国加拿大(目前2500难民),据说英国,中国,澳大利亚,日本,法国 ,沙特,科威特等富余国家接受的人数也远远低于加拿大,不知道GDP 较低的加拿大曽的什么能。恐怕说难民是加拿大造成的狃伦国际上说不通,也不合理。
回复
这次的难民潮与当年的越南,柬埔寨甚至科索沃难民潮完全不一样。按理说,既然是难民,任何没有战争的国家,只要生活条件比受难国好就行了. 而这些人偏偏嫌弃匈牙利,希腊、意大利,马其顿. 非要到英,德这种富裕国家不可。根本就是假难民。是假借难民的偷渡客。背后有人给他们指点, 从中牟利(金钱上/政治上的), 包括具体路线,偷渡工具,如何申请等。这件事的本质是欧洲的法律制度包括申根公约, 存在巨大的漏洞, 使这些人有机可乘。 只要看看希腊危机就知道, 欧元区已被证明不现实, 接下来, 难民潮也在考验欧洲。那些接受采访的人还添着脸说“饭不好吃“---(你想天天吃牛排啊, 又没人请你来,总比你们国家好吧). 就冲这一点能看出他们吃透了欧洲人。留着这些人,会大大加速欧洲的穆斯林化。欧洲的领导人太幼稚。最后, 说不定会选出个类似纳粹的政党,成为另一场战争策源地。 记得06年以军轰炸贝鲁特, 竟然炸出2万加拿大人,政府还派了军舰去接人. 听者都好笑. 其实就是当年的难民。
回复
人世间就是五浊恶世,很不幸我们降临此地,还得受生老病死之苦,如果有上帝或观音菩萨,那么加拿大应该是离他们最近的地方了。
回复
3党比谁更能出卖选民的利益为自己贴金,如果他们真是“活菩萨”,就自己捐款帮组难民,你拿出再多别人也不能有非议,自己不掏腰包却慷慨大方纳税人的钱算啥本事?这事上谁拿别人的钱更慷慨的,不是英雄,是败类。看形势,自由党和NDP 在争先恐后的当败类!
回复
http://forum.yorkbbs.ca/chat/4071278.aspx?page=2
回复
克飞,你这么反感西方民主国家,你在这边呆着干嘛?不觉得难受吗?回去吧,到北韩去更合适你!
回复
战争的只是一小撮人, 利用媒体工具将广大民众蒙了。象美国的共和党如布什家族, 石油和军火是他们重要的产业, 一箭双雕的事, 谁不做? 问题是体制和社会能不能不让他们做的问题。
回复
本为联合国常任理事国的美国和中国为什么不接受难民?加拿大已接受了世界上最多的难民,而且本国经济已严重衰退。看看中国的月饼,这么强大有排场,可这是没有一点国际人道主义的强大和自豪,显示的只是最先进的杀人武器,比起加拿大,中国是一个很渺小的大国。
回复
x
x