投票仅剩数天 我为什么不选联邦保守党？

587 Canadian academics condemn Harper’s racist election propaganda 587 名加拿大学者谴责哈珀的种族主义竞选宣传! “We condemn the unethical Conservative strategy that brings shame to Canadian politics.”“我们谴责保守党的不道德的策略，他们给加拿大政治带来羞耻” by: Various Authors Posted Oct 9, 2015We are a diverse group of academics with different political views and different political allegiances. We are united by a common interest in the integrity of democratic processes and a concern about the ugly and dangerous turn we have recently witnessed in the election campaign. In democratic electoral politics there is an ethical line that distinguishes spirited partisan strategy from cynical tactics that betray the values of mutual respect and toleration that lie at the heart of civil democratic discourse. Honourable politicians do not cross that line even when they think doing so will be politically advantageous. Disreputable politicians ignore the line when they find it convenient to do so.The Conservative Party under Stephen Harper has already come perilously close to this line by suggesting that religion is an appropriate basis to select refugees and by fanning fears of terrorism as a pretext for revoking citizenship from some Canadians. Distinguishing ‘old-stock’ Canadians from new ones was also divisive and problematic. Increasingly, the Conservatives seem to have been opting for a particularly nasty form of “wedge politics”.However, by injecting the inflammatory rhetoric of ‘barbaric cultural practices’ into the current campaign, the Conservative Party has flagrantly crossed the line. The repeated use of this phrase along with a proposed tip line to root out undesirables are cynically calculated to distract and divide citizens by insinuating that some law abiding and peaceful members of the community are freedom-hating barbarians who threaten Canadian society. The Conservatives know that Canada faces no such threat and that the vast majority of citizens, irrespective of their religious commitments or cultural backgrounds, embrace the basic rights and liberties upon which our democracy is based. By conjuring up a phantom menace to the country and implying that some immigrants and religious minorities are enemies, the Conservatives hope to pit Canadians against one another. Like many sophisticated forms of vicious propaganda, the invocation of barbarism is meant to create fear and anxiety rather than to identify a real problem.We enjoy the rule of law in Canada and it requires the equal application of the law. Those who break the law should be treated within a common system of criminal justice. A special mechanism that targets some minorities for extra scrutiny is as unnecessary as it is odious. The devious strategists who have devised this campaign know that their objectives are not well served by employing racist or anti-religious epithets, so they ask us to imagine unspecified but supposedly real barbarians. So we are encouraged to demonize those who are different from ourselves and whose religious or cultural practices we do not share or understand. In the present context, this is hate mongering, and it has no place in Canadian democracy.We do not deny that there is room to discuss and debate how contemporary democracies should respond to religious, cultural and linguistic pluralism. Indeed, Canadian legal and political theory is at the forefront of exploring such matters. But a common point of departure for these debates and discussions is a commitment to civility, decency and toleration. Toleration does not require that one like or endorse the cultural or religious practices of others, but it does require that we refrain from insulting the dignity of those with whom we disagree. The Conservatives have shown contempt for a politics of mutual respect. We condemn the unethical Conservative strategy that brings shame to Canadian politics. We hope that Canadians will join us in repudiating the politics of hate. Instead let us embrace a nobler vision of civil discourse that is truly oriented to achieving the common good for all Canadians.Signed,Daniel Weinstock, Professor, Faculty of Law, McGill University Colin Macleod, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Faculty of Law, Victoria University Jocelyn Maclure, Professeur, Faculté de philosophie, Université Laval Avigail Eisenberg, Professor, Department of Political Science, Victoria UniversityAt time of posting, 587 individuals had signed this letter. See full list of signatories here. http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/2015/10/09/587-canadian-academics-condemn-harpers-racist-election-propaganda/

你犯病了吗？犯病该去的地方是医院！

🤭吵来吵去的，然后发现并不能给自己带来多少好处。 然后，各大政党突然发现，华裔最适合用来搞内斗🤭

你这个怪胎，你能容忍穆斯林妇女带面纱，为她们的权利呐喊，你怎么就不能容忍华人反对和抵制大麻，反对和抵制跟我们华人的文化和宗教格格不入的性教育？

回复 asana：你才是怪胎 华人文化和性教育哪里格格不入？华人是认为大麻合法化孩子就会成大麻仔 实行性教育孩子就会变同性恋吗 为什么会有这种想法呢 事实可以拿出来讨论 我反对的是那种根本不了解事实就靠一拍脑袋形成意见的人 一些话题视为洪水猛兽 一味回避抵抗 是解决不了问题的 穆斯林妇女蒙面碍你什么事了

回复 chinagirl51：你这个怪胎是不是已经大麻上瘾或者干脆就已经是...？不然你怎么没看见那么多的华人家长反对这些垃圾？我周围的华人家长还没有发现一个是赞成的！维恩说已经咨询过家长，事实是我们根本就不知道有这回事！维恩这个骗子！

还需要签字. 而模仿别人签字是违法的.

常斌 造假就不可信

回复 好兴致：常斌 造假? 没有看到过有关报道。链接？