邹至蕙批哈珀 待新加拿大人如次等公民

【继续转帖】 On Military Harper has cut $1.1 billion from Veterans Affairs, despite 40,000 veterans returning home from Afghanistan. The majority of the savings come from veterans’ death and disability compensation.http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/11-billion-in-unspent-funds-at-veterans-affairs-documents-show/article21665655 After misleading Canadians to believe F-35 fight jet procurement would cost $9 billion, Conservatives reveal they intend to spend $40 billion on F-35 fighter jet – a jet most experts agree is poorly designed and ill suited for Canadian needs. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/budget-watchdog-accuses-tories-of-low-balling-f-35-cost/article4104618 http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/cost-of-buying-servicing-f-35-fighter-jets-soars-to-40b-sources-1.1069258 Stephen Harper breaks military protocol and reveals troops faces in Iraq for video shoot, but members of the media accompanying Harper were told tonot show the faces of any Canadian soldier for fear of retaliation from ISIS.http://globalnews.ca/news/1979744/dnd-media-cant-show-soldiers-faces-pms-video-can Harper wanted to join the war in Iraq despite there being no evidence of weapons of mass destruction. This war would later take the country into turmoil after US contracted military firm Blackwater slaughtered innocent Iraqi's in the street, turning a huge portion of the country against US/UK coalition. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/michael-d-nicula/canada-iraq-war_b_2912798.html Harper government spends $700,000 fighting disabled veterans in court on benefits after Harper took away life long pension for veterans who have become disabled while fighting for Canada. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/disabled-veterans-in-court-fighting-federal-government-on-benefits-1.2859114http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/01/28/veterans-lawsuit-canada-harper-government_n_6563592.html Harper government ignores former Supreme Court justice Marie Deschamps report of endemic sexual assault and harassment in the military. The Harper government’s reaction was non existent and ignored report.http://ipolitics.ca/2015/05/06/missing-in-action-how-harper-is-shrugging-off-military-sexual-assault On Crime The evidence has been mounting for years that the Harper government’s signature “tough-on-crime” policies have more to do with cynical politicking than with actually fighting crime.http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2015/04/14/harpers-tough-on-crime-agenda-gets-a-well-deserved-slap-editorial.html Texas conservatives reject Harper's crime plan: 'Been there; done that; didn't work,' say Texas crime-fighters. Conservatives in the United States' toughest crime-fighting jurisdiction — Texas — say the Harper government's crime strategy won't work. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/texas-conservatives-reject-harper-s-crime-plan-1.1021017 Stephen Harper’s ‘tough-on-crime’ policies are doomed to fail http://o.canada.com/news/national/maher-stephen-harpers-tough-on-crime-policies-are-doomed-to-fail All serious empirical research in Canada and Europe over the last 30 years shows beyond a doubt that longer sentences donot deter offenders. http://www.ucobserver.org/features/2012/06/crime Despite dropping crime rate previously, Conservatives crime laws and 'tough on crime' stance result in needlessly locking even more people up. Number of people in prison skyrocketed under Conservative rule.http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada-s-prison-population-at-all-time-high-1.2440039 Harper doesn't believe that crime has sociological explanations, and instead only seeks to address crime by increasing the punishment for offenders. This obviously won't prevent crime, but only seeks to punish wrongdoers

【转帖，来源：网络】 Two tiered citizenship now in Canada As a result of this new law, dual citizens and people who have immigrated to Canada can have their citizenship taken away while other Canadians cannot. Bill C-24 could easily be used against non-terrorists—for example, a journalist who is convicted of a “terrorism offence” in another country for reporting on human rights violations by the government. https://bccla.org/2015/06/its-of ... p-goes-into-effect Harper turns 863,000 Canadians into second-class citizens. "Say you were born in the United Kingdom, like me and 126,000 other Canadians, and have dual citizenship. Even if you’ve never lived and never intend to live in the U.K., you can now be deported if government thinks it has cause. In fact, the new rules say that all you have to do to merit the asterisk is have a claim to citizenship elsewhere, so anybody with a grandparent born in the U.K. likely falls into this category. Overnight, we have some Canadians discovering they suddenly have fewer rights as citizens than, say, native-born career criminals."http://www.vancouversun.com/stephen+hume+harper+turns+canadians+into+second+class+citizens/11410121/story.html?__lsa=a606-1c0d I always knew I wasn’t an “old-stock” Canadian. But I was very shocked when one day I woke up and discovered that thanks to Bill C-24 I had somehow become a second-class Canadian. Old age security. All you have to do is look at the application form and you will see that for non-Canadian born citizens proof of our arrival and citizenship is not enough to qualify. Canadians born here are not asked to document every address they have ever lived at in order to get OAS. Are we assumed to be cheats? http://www.thestar.com/opinion/c ... class-canadian.html It means that government would reward them citizenship for “good behavior” and could take it away for “bad behavior”. This is a form of “punishment,” and in fact, an unnecessary punishment, especially when there are other avenues to deal with the so-called “bad behavior”. The introduction of citizenship as merely a privilege, and not a right comes from the negative perception that immigrants are cheaters. It constructs the idea that immigrants, refugees, foreign workers, and naturalized citizens are terrorists or criminals and need to be deported to their “home countries.” http://www.sfu.ca/education/cels ... rner/bill-c-24.html On your privacy: Environmentalists obstructing a pipeline route or a peaceful blockade of a logging road by an Indigenous community could all be seen as threats tonational security and charged as terrorists. https://bccla.org/2015/03/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-bill-c-51 C-51 Criminalizes speech acts that have no connection to acts of violence. https://bccla.org/2015/03/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-bill-c-51 Since C-51 has passed and is now law, Canada’s no-fly list is now a secret list compiled with secret evidence, only reviewable through court proceedings that may also be secret. https://bccla.org/2015/03/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-bill-c-51 More than 100 academics are urging the government to drastically alter C-51, the Conservatives' proposed anti-terrorism legislation, arguing it is far too broad and doesn't come with safeguards to protect Canadians' privacy rights.http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/anti-terrorism-bill-c-51-dangerous-legislation-100-academics-say-1.2975233 Conservatives shut down review of C-51 after only 3 days to ram through bill despite strong warnings from experts:http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/anti-terrorism-bill-c-51-dangerous-legislation-100-academics-say-1.2975233 Privacy commissioner is concerned the federal government is taking toonarrow a reading of a recent Supreme Court of Canada decision that limited warrantless access to Canadians’ personal information.http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/11/20/conservatives_urged_to_explain_position_on_internet_privacy.html

保守党的反恐法案C51更会使普通加拿大人感到恐怖，保守党会监视每一个加拿大人的一切活动，例如：电子邮件，通话历史，日常生活的方方面面等等。

保守党对只有加拿大国籍的公民也会剥夺公民身份。当然不会剥夺上等加拿大公民的公民权。基本上所有大陆华人都是下等公民，如果犯罪，都会剥夺公民权。

这个女人毫无信誉，说退出联邦政坛，现在又出来。

有邹至蕙之类的人为罪犯辩护，难怪加拿大成为犯罪者的“天堂”。