谢尔多伦多发表演说 着重吸引年轻选民

加拿大本是个天赐的福地。只要自己不作死，就天下太平。可惜，自由党土豆为出风头满世界撒币召唤难民恐怖分子罪犯来加拿大，到处招惹各个与加拿大有利益相关的国家。即使是头猪，都比土豆强。

和土豆比还是强了百倍！

说得靠谱

谢尔要比烂土豆要强多了

是头猪也比土豆强

谢尔比土豆强，最好土豆下台换个领导。谢尔老实说实力也不是很强。

卖保险的当总理，加拿大没人了，草包成灾！

曾经加拿大国会最年轻的Skeaker，国会墙上就有人家的画像....当选保守党党领时 只有37岁。 说人家做过保险经纪的、想一想 谁刚走入社会实践就 当了CEO.....（当然 红二代 赵家人例外）

加拿大可以无为而治，就是经受不起圣母婊的折腾。民众不要希望当政者做太多的事，否则，做的都将是让加拿大倒霉的坏事。政府越白莲花，社会治安越乱。所谓物极必反，本来正确的事情如果被圣母婊们做到了极端就变成了比错误更恶心的存在。绿色恐怖主义就是环保极端后的例子。

如果这个草包当了总理老百姓一样没有好日子过，比傻逼土豆好不道那去，看看那张无知的逼脸，懂个几把，懂得怎样搞经济吗除了走走秀还能做什么

又草包一个，保守党赶紧换马吧，不然明年危险。

垃圾的做秀，懂个屁呀

加拿大选谁都好不了 这个国家就是慵懒没有上进心 福利国家一般都这个德行 不遇到什么危机可以很舒服的活着 遇到危机就傻逼了没办法解决

发评论的几位，请别侮辱猪的智慧，怎么跟土豆比呢？！

"尽管多伦多大雪纷飞，道路泥泞难行，但是依然有数百名群众感到了演讲现场。公众们可以随意向谢尔提问。虽然大多数参会者均为保守党的支持者，但是这一演讲项目其实对公众开放。不过，谢尔并没有向杜鲁多那样，需要应付诸多在演讲集会当中出现的闹事者。" 等他当选之后看看，小布什、特朗普当选后有多少游行示威的？有的人啊，赢了，我顺应民意、天意，输了，肯定是保守派作弊了，选举不公。

无耻51删我评论！

演讲演讲，上台后有啥打算和实际行动说说？ 你要赶走非法难民吗? 你说为年轻人提供可负担住房，你能禁止一切外国人在加拿大买房和洗钱吗？ 现在健康的难民来了几年根本不工作，养一堆孩子吃福利，你能让他们在一二年还不工作就停止他们的福利金吗？ 另外住豪宅的报假低收入把政府福利占全，你能调查这些房产几百万收入只报二三万甚至零收入却拿加拿大低收入的各种福利的骗子吗？ ...

这个保守党党魁是特意针对特鲁多而挑选的年轻人，结果他的优点到现在还是“年轻”，其它实在是差强人意。 另外，估计到选举前也拿不出竞选纲领，多半也是为抢权而采取的策略……少说少错，大权在握后再随心所欲。

这个也很帅气 也靠谱

zvi zvi5 days ago According to this article the stagnant France is growing in wealth more than booming USA, and it tells you everything you need to know about all these kinds of indices. It is a fictitious assessment of potential the country has. Beyond that if you bring 350 thousand people from the Third World every year , how quality of your Labour Force can grow. If most University students studying everything else but not science and engineering how inflax of MBA and teachers can increase the quality of your Labour force? For at least 30 years everybody including economists explain to Canadians that future for them in temporarily, part time jobs in small companies, but small companies are small exactly because they don't have capital to invest in new technologies and skilled highly paid workforce and concentrated in the Service Industries which by definition have very low productivity of Labour. Money are going to houses, not Stock Exchange, oh yea money going into houses because people need to live somewhere, and houses are expensive because of set of policies executed by ruling elites. Stock exchange it is great, but any RRSP holder will tell you that at best on long term his investment on average shows no more than 3-4% growth, and with deducted inflation it is even less. More ReplyReplies (11)10615 bill bill4 days ago That's the conclusion of a research paper from the International Institute for Sustainable Development, which pointed to "the depletion of many of Canada's natural resources" as a major source of the problem... We are giving away our resources for next to nothing...DUHHH!... Also, we have a "Branch Plant" economy. Canada is own by Foreign Corporations... More ReplyReplies (10)1509 ST ST4 days ago Our loss of wealth is due to the inability of our governments to approve things in an efficient and timely manner. Too much concern for the few over the good of the many. The various pipelines that were not built is a very good example. Our cost of housing is also attributable to the costly and lengthy approval process. As governments grow our wealth is diminished. Have a look at Greece. ReplyReplies (5)1058 Mike Mike4 days ago Canada does not have a diversified economy, and it is foreign money that is buying up all our real estate, largely due to our policy of mass immigration and lax rules on foreign ownership. ReplyReplies 🎼1378 Abe Abe4 days ago Too much tax on small business to drive them out of the market and push them to collect welfare ReplyReplies (2)631 oxanacanada oxanacanada4 days ago "Canada's current economic model "a recipe for impoverishment." If you were a money manager and you grew a client's income by eating into their wealth, "you wouldn't be in business very long," Smith quipped." - could not agree more. We are bringing half a million new people every year and we are being told it's good for the economy. "Despite increasing investments in higher education and retraining, "we are still not getting an increased return on those investments," he said. Smith suggested the problem could be partly "structural." The disappearance of manufacturing jobs, replaced by lower-paying service jobs, reduces the earnings potential of those workers." Does that mean that we simply don't need that many new people who drive our wages and salaries down? Reply214 James James4 days ago Canada needs stronger leadership, who wants to invest in a country where the PM is not going to back businesses because he is far out of touch with reality (it just a drama class for him). Trudeau failed with the NAFTA agreement selling out the dairy farm, hasn't been able to get a pipeline build (getting away our natural resources) and made some apologies (weakness). There is more division in this country than even because everybody lives by different rules, especially indigenous people and people from Quebec ($13 billion equalization). And JT's solution is to continue widening these gaps. ReplyReplies (3)485 Queen Theresa Queen Theresa5 days ago Too much tax that drives business away to the friendlier for business and warmer climate right next door. Add all the money we’re wasting on refugees and funding all the native real housechiefs of Canada’s lavish lifestyles it’s not surprising were heading for broke.

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/canadian-wealth-fall-highest-g7-195300187.html lots of readers' comments. Top Reactions Ron Ron 4 days ago This article only looks at half of the picture. It does not look a household debt as a percentage of "wealth". If you did that, Canada would be last among G7 nations since our cumulative unsecured household debt lat year was over $2.8 trillion, last among developed nations which were studied. We have to add to this the number of bankruptcies and consumer proposals which have been made during the past eight to ten years and you have a sad picture of declining wealth and prosperity outside of the top 15% of income earners. Something will break and it will not be foreign investors who have purchased tens of thousands of houses as investments. What I find interesting is that the analyst has this to say: "We're putting a lot of eggs into a few economic baskets, and if those baskets go south we could find ourselves in trouble more quickly than we think," Proponents for sustainable economic policies have been saying for years, decades, even, that we must diversify the economy and stop selling resources to other countries and buy them back again as manufactured products at ten or more times the price we sell them. But tell that to conservative politicians who for decades have been relying on oil and gas sector, timber, mining, water and other primary industries for provincial and federal revenue. If you want to prepare for the future, you must balance primary, secondary and tertiary industries and diversify to the point where you are not relying on taking stuff from the ground, selling it cheaply then importing it back as manufactured goods at many times the price. That is basic economics which nearly all ministers of economy have never grasped since the days of Sir John A. MacDonald. We need to rethink everything or face not just declining wealth and prosperity, but a near future more poor than many developing countries are now.