WHY THIS TIME THE OWNER WASN'T CHARGE FOR PUBLIC MISDEMEANOR, UNLAWFUL DETAINMENT, AND VIOLATING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE SUSPECT?
WHY POLICE AND EVERYBODY INVOLVED WASN'T CHARGED FOR NO MASK IN PUBLIC AREA?
回复
legend2010
2021-01-13 08:48
举报
1
The first the owner did not use any weapon, the second the owner is critical injuired by the thief abuse, the third the owners standing in the private property be protected by the legislation, so the owners will not be charged. That is the legislation.
多伦多餐馆被砸门爆窃!老板一家四口合力擒贼