Soviet Union recognized the State of Israel 2 days after it was founded in 1948. United Nation recognizes it 1 day later followed by most other countries in the world. So Israel has always been a legitimate state by any internationl standard. In almost every Arab-Israel war since then, it was the Arab side that attacked first, and they only have one goal: to eliminate the state Israel and drive the Jews to exile again. Israel has every right to defend herself against such aggression. It is a country that is not much larger than GTA, they simply fight for their survival.
应该知道什么是狐假虎威吧?
侵占就是侵占!与过程如何无关。犹太人如果没有美国的帮忙,应该是无法在现有土地上建国的。当时所谓的UN也都是由美国一手控制。
以色列建国已经60多年了,可是当初承诺的巴勒斯坦国却连影子都还没有,是不是有点欺人太甚了呢?
从因果关系来说,希特勒应该负首要责任。要不是希特勒发动动了二战,并且大量屠杀犹太人,怎么会轻易地给美国找到一个借口给以色列建国呢?
从长远的战略上来讲,美国这步棋是高明的。这是打入阿拉伯社区的一个楔子。并且这个楔子也一直在按美国的意愿,不辞辛劳的工作着。
Soviet Union recognized the State of Israel 2 days after it was founded in 1948. United Nation recognizes it 1 day later followed by most other countries in the world. So Israel has always been a legitimate state by any internationl standard. In almost every Arab-Israel war since then, it was the Arab side that attacked first, and they only have one goal: to eliminate the state Israel and drive the Jews to exile again. Israel has every right to defend herself against such aggression. It is a country that is not much larger than GTA, they simply fight for their survival.
不会吧?
1、有人到你家分了你的地,你还能很客气地说:别客气,你拿的太少了,还可以多拿点。这不是傻B吗?
2、既然已经做了强盗了,何来的正当反击?
3、请问以色列打赢了什么战争,赢得了“战利品”(阿拉伯国家的土地)是一战、二战还是阿拉伯战争?想清楚了回答,否则后面有大棒的。
4、如果阿拉伯国家承认了以色列的存在,不就等于承认了以色列的合法性了嘛,以色列为什么还要归还土地呢?
反过来讲,如果以色列愿意归还所侵占的土地,他就应该从中东完全撤出,这似乎也是不可能的吧?
5、其实现在地球人都知道,要以色列归还巴勒斯坦的全部被占领土已经是不可能的了,现在所要求的只是能回到1948的状态而以。
Looks like “人身攻击” is all you are interested in. If you work in a Canadian company, ask you colleagues who support dictators like Ahmadinejad, Khadafi and Saddam, and who support the democracy and free political system we have in the west, you will understand what I mean by saying your point of view represents a tiny minority, I am not talking about the color of your skin. Our media and elected politicians have to reflect the views and take the stand of us people, or they can not survive.
最无耻的就是这个。
你怎么不问问伊拉克人、阿富汗人,布什是不是战犯?
“民主的”美国人能容忍其他国家人民对他们的不同意见吗?
既然不能容忍,就老老实实承认算了。
可偏偏还要BZ立牌坊,认为自己说的是“普世”公理,是代表世界人民在说话。
回复
桃木钉
2009-09-29 13:19
举报
0
Looks like “人身攻击” is all you are interested in. If you work in a Canadian company, ask you colleagues who support dictators like Ahmadinejad, Khadafi and Saddam, and who support the democracy and free political system we have in the west, you will understand what I mean by saying your point of view represents a tiny minority, I am not talking about the color of your skin. Our media and elected politicians have to reflect the views and take the stand of us people, or they can not survive.
天哪,你那也叫英语?此外你好象脑筋也不太清楚,加拿大人不支持别国领导人有什么好奇怪,你不如问问有多少中国人会支持哈巴和布什?我建议还是去英文媒体多发些贴子的好,本地人一看你的英语就会明确告诉你什么是minority,即便别人看不到你在网络后的那张亚洲脸孔。无论从哪方面看,你都不是majority的一员,下次装象前,也该借两根葱往鼻子里擦才好。
回复
weinberger
2009-09-29 08:04
举报
0
Looks like “人身攻击” is all you are interested in. If you work in a Canadian company, ask you colleagues who support dictators like Ahmadinejad, Khadafi and Saddam, and who support the democracy and free political system we have in the west, you will understand what I mean by saying your point of view represents a tiny minority, I am not talking about the color of your skin. Our media and elected politicians have to reflect the views and take the stand of us people, or they can not survive.
我还以为你真的融入了这个社会,看来你还在门外。首先,你的英语就滥的可以。什么是“Our difference is so great”,我就不觉得我们之间的不同是那么的“great”。另外你有狂想症,你的敌人几时成了我的英雄?我心目中从来就未曾有过任何英雄,你要强加也无济于事。再者,你快乐是你自己的事,阿Q也曾经很快乐的,不过遗憾的事还是有:没睡过秀才娘子及其他女人,又被无端的判了死刑,民国也是号称民主的吧。通常IQ越低的人高兴指数就越高啦,你大概也不例外。最后还是要忠告一句,无论你是不是做了白人的狗,你都是minority。而且奉劝你以后还是不要用tiny来形容minority,弄不好就给人告了歧视,那时你的民主国家及majority就无法保护你了,毕竟咬了人的狗是该人道毁灭的。
内贾德联大发言时 加拿大代表退席抗议