No point to discuss further. Our difference is so great that neither of us can convince each other on anything. My enemies are your heroes, and your enemies are my heroes and it will stay that way. In a democratic country, our difference can be solved by each voting for the politicans that represent our different views. In a totalism country, our difference probably can only be solved on the battlefield. I'm so glad that I am living in a free country that all media and politicans reflet MY views of pro democracy and freedom, and be hostile and disdainful to dictators like Ahmadinejad, and people like you are always a tiny minority
我还以为你真的融入了这个社会,看来你还在门外。首先,你的英语就滥的可以。什么是“Our difference is so great”,我就不觉得我们之间的不同是那么的“great”。另外你有狂想症,你的敌人几时成了我的英雄?我心目中从来就未曾有过任何英雄,你要强加也无济于事。再者,你快乐是你自己的事,阿Q也曾经很快乐的,不过遗憾的事还是有:没睡过秀才娘子及其他女人,又被无端的判了死刑,民国也是号称民主的吧。通常IQ越低的人高兴指数就越高啦,你大概也不例外。最后还是要忠告一句,无论你是不是做了白人的狗,你都是minority。而且奉劝你以后还是不要用tiny来形容minority,弄不好就给人告了歧视,那时你的民主国家及majority就无法保护你了,毕竟咬了人的狗是该人道毁灭的。
No point to discuss further. Our difference is so great that neither of us can convince each other on anything. My enemies are your heroes, and your enemies are my heroes and it will stay that way. In a democratic country, our difference can be solved by each voting for the politicans that represent our different views. In a totalism country, our difference probably can only be solved on the battlefield. I'm so glad that I am living in a free country that all media and politicans reflet MY views of pro democracy and freedom, and be hostile and disdainful to dictators like Ahmadinejad, and people like you are always a tiny minority
虽然你的英文狗屁不通,但多少还是能猜到大致意思。你大概是太天真,要知道以色列才是真正拥有核武器的国家,而且以色列一直在等待一个时机把阿拉伯国家从地球上抹去,所以以色列才是真正的恐怖主义者。伊朗不过是虚张声势,况且西方报道通常夸大伊朗的声势,而你不幸成为了这些虚假报道的受害者。要知道,政治游戏,不经要听其言,更重要的是观其行。
Ahmadinejad openly calls for the elimination of Israel, Jews, and says Holocaust never happened. He sounds more like a terrorist than the head of a state. It's right for the Canadian delegation to stage a walk-out protest during his speech. As on the matter of free speech, try to think of it this way, if CNN suddenly becomes like CCTV, Wall Street Journal becomes People's daily, do you think they would be able to keep any of their readers and audiences? That's the point, if in a country over 99% favor democracy and freedom, and only less than 1% are the sympathizers (like you guys) of communists, dictators and Islam extremists , what do you think the media of that country would do? That's right, the media would certainly take the position of the 99% of people that love freedom, and be disdainful of dictators like the Iranian President. That's why you can protest, you can shout, but you will never see the west media switch position to favor a dictator.
虽然你的英文狗屁不通,但多少还是能猜到大致意思。你大概是太天真,要知道以色列才是真正拥有核武器的国家,而且以色列一直在等待一个时机把阿拉伯国家从地球上抹去,所以以色列才是真正的恐怖主义者。伊朗不过是虚张声势,况且西方报道通常夸大伊朗的声势,而你不幸成为了这些虚假报道的受害者。要知道,政治游戏,不经要听其言,更重要的是观其行。
再说西方媒体,以不支持“独裁者”为由而决绝报道“独裁者”的言论,并且可以随意给人冠以“独裁者”的高帽,这本身就是一种独裁行为。一个人或团体是否独裁,应该由读者直接判断,而不是由媒体界定,任何带有评论的媒体,都是某些利益集团的宣传工具,而非真正意义上的言论自由的载体。通过不停的灌输独裁及邪恶轴心的概念,大多数西方人已经被充分洗脑,萨达姆就是一个例子。现实中的布什难道不是比萨达姆更邪恶?
内贾德联大发言时 加拿大代表退席抗议