最初由 Sedona 发布:
Thanks, you really have done lots of research work to help us.
My pleasure. Instead of judging all the other people blindly, we should open up to all the information first and then make comments.
回复
Sedona
2007-02-15 21:34
举报
0
最初由 xpxpxpx p 发布:
Dilaver Güler 与Huseyincan Celil应该就是同一个人,这是他自己在1998年的法庭声明里说的。
I am known as Dilaver Güler, my name is Huseyincan Qari Haji. I am a Turkish citizen, with Uyghur descent and I am a merchant. Before I was arrested, I lived in Istanbul. I have been in Kyrgyzstan prison for 9 months and now I am on trial with a chance to speak.
我的使用名字是Dilaver Güler,本名Huseyinjan Jelil,维吾尔裔土耳其公民,目前是商人。在被逮捕之前,我家住伊斯坦布尔,经商为生。在本次审讯之前,我被拘禁在吉尔吉斯的监狱里已经九个月了,借本次审讯的机会,我发表声明如下。
http://www.51.ca/bbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133883
国际通缉令也是属实的,看看下面就清楚了。
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,194426,00.html
In a statement posted on a government Web site late Thursday, Noufal Kholmatov, deputy director of the Uzbek branch of Interpol(国际刑警组织), said that Huseyincal Celil's fingerprints matched those of Turkish citizen Guler Dilaver, who it said was accused of terror activities in neighboring Kyrgyzstan.
Thanks, you really have done lots of research work to help us.
最初由 陆海 发布:
支持一下SUNNY2008. SUNNY2008在看问题时的思路是很清楚的.
顺便在这里补充一下, 根据报道, 加拿大政府的不满还有一点是它没有被告知 Celil 到底犯了什么罪 (如果它被通知参与旁听这也就不成问题). 被国际通缉的是叫 Culer 的人. 乌孜别克政府说 Celil 的指纹与 Culer 一样, 我想, 加拿大政府自然想知道乌孜别克是如何确认 Celil 的指纹与那叫 Culer 的一样以及吉尔吉斯是如何获得 Culer 的指纹等确定一罪犯的必要程序, 这些都会和应该在法庭上呈现, 所以参加旁听对加拿大政府了解 Celil 是否就是被指控的 Culer 很重要. 没有这些证据加拿大估计很难判定 Celil 获得加籍是违法的. 在没有足够证据证明 Celil 不是他向联合国难民署和加国政府所说的那个 Celil, 加国政府取消Celil的加国国籍是不现实的, 否则它将来会面临比 Arar 更大的赔偿和压力, 特别是一旦真正的凶手 Culer 被抓到的话.
具报道说, 好象(记得不是很清楚了), 何亚非来Ottawa的其中一个任务是向加国政府说明Celil的罪行. 但没有报道说加国政府是否满意何的解释.
也没有看到报道说 Celil 有超出吉尔吉斯对 Culer 的指控以及Celil从中国监狱逃出去的指控. 联合国难民署和加国显然知道 Celil 是从中国监狱逃出去的. 而中国当时在90年代判玉山江很大可能性不是他在中国境内杀了人, 因为如果他那时就被发现杀了人, 他当时应该是被判死刑立即执行的. 当然有这可能性后来发现他在中国杀了人, 但似乎更大可能性就是中国认定他就象乌孜别克说的, 他就是 Culer 在吉尔吉斯杀了人. 在没有经过法庭对证据的审理之前, Celil 或玉山江与 Culer 是否是同一人在理论上是未知的.
Dilaver Güler 与Huseyincan Celil应该就是同一个人,这是他自己在1998年的法庭声明里说的。
I am known as Dilaver Güler, my name is Huseyincan Qari Haji. I am a Turkish citizen, with Uyghur descent and I am a merchant. Before I was arrested, I lived in Istanbul. I have been in Kyrgyzstan prison for 9 months and now I am on trial with a chance to speak.
我的使用名字是Dilaver Güler,本名Huseyinjan Jelil,维吾尔裔土耳其公民,目前是商人。在被逮捕之前,我家住伊斯坦布尔,经商为生。在本次审讯之前,我被拘禁在吉尔吉斯的监狱里已经九个月了,借本次审讯的机会,我发表声明如下。
http://www.51.ca/bbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133883
国际通缉令也是属实的,看看下面就清楚了。
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,194426,00.html
In a statement posted on a government Web site late Thursday, Noufal Kholmatov, deputy director of the Uzbek branch of Interpol(国际刑警组织), said that Huseyincal Celil's fingerprints matched those of Turkish citizen Guler Dilaver, who it said was accused of terror activities in neighboring Kyrgyzstan.
回复
Sedona
2007-02-15 21:30
举报
0
最初由 choice 发布:
Canada is a independent country, our government grant sb's citizenship does not have to seek chinese's approval, and we do not and will not bow to any pressure from chinese government
Choice, read before you post.
Of course, Canada does not need China's approval, but because of dual citizenship, Celil from Canada's perspective is both a Chinese and a Canadian.
On the other hand, China also doesn't need Canadian approval to maintain or cancel Celil's Chinese citizenship. China, however, sees him as a Chinese only because of the clean hand principle.
Whether to bow has nothing to do with my argument.
最初由 choice 发布:
Canada is a independent country, our government grant sb's citizenship does not have to seek chinese's approval, and we do not and will not bow to any pressure from chinese government
中国也一样,中国也不会害怕加拿大的威胁 😁
回复
choice
2007-02-15 21:07
举报
0
Canada is a independent country, our government grant sb's citizenship does not have to seek chinese's approval, and we do not and will not bow to any pressure from chinese government
回复
sunny2008
2007-02-15 20:08
举报
0
59l楼和61楼你们单独开个帖呢,我也想学习学习。
回复
Sedona
2007-02-15 20:06
举报
0
最初由 陆海 发布:
实际上领事保护并没有很大作用, 并不说它就能保护被法律认定的罪人不受法律制裁. 比如象在多伦多绑架小女孩的那个留学生中国使馆是实施了领事保护. 领事保护只能产生要求所在国的法庭按当地法律公正审判的压力, 并不能偏离法律. 有人对我以前的一个回贴说外交官有豁免权, 我没有回答, 因为外交官的豁免权不属于领事保护范畴的东西.
在加拿大因为得罪官员被栽赃的可能性很小, 因为要经过法庭的繁琐程序和严格的证据审查. 就反对这种繁琐的法庭程序, 认为这样效率太低. 但我认为这会使我们生活的更安全一点, 因为要影响审查程序的门槛太高. 估计有人会说(实际上在51上已经有不少贴子这样说了), 繁琐的程序就让坏人得益. 实际上的问题是坏人到底干坏事的目的是什么, 是喜欢有机会被卷入那冗长的绝对精神紧张的法律审判之中? ... 这个话题解释起来就太长了. 就此打住.
Very good argument. Consulate protection is not right, because the consul cannot protect any suspect. The proper concept is consulate service, e.g. visit, food, clothing, legal representation.
I had argued with 北山 too many times the concept of innocent before proven guilty, to protect everyone in the society, but he can't get it.
回复
Sedona
2007-02-15 19:59
举报
0
最初由 WinST 发布:
确实信口雌黄
的确是超级SB贴一个.我还在加拿大修了一年法律, 原来国际国内法都是您老定的?!
是俺书白念了,还是你脑子注水了, 哈哈
If you have studied law in Canada, I would like to learn from you. I am not a lawyer. I work for the government to interpret the laws to formulate programs, services, policies and procedures, so have a reasonable foundation of legal knowledge and skills.
My first position is from China's perspective, Celil is Chinese based on the clean hand principle. From Canada's perspective, Celil is both Chinese and Canadian based on dual citizenship. He is still a Canadian before a lawyer court rules his citizenship void. No matter what, he is a Chinese.
My second position is China has jurisdiction because Celil is a Chinese and he had a bench warrant of arrest on him (he escaped from a Chinese jail).
My third position is China refuses to allow consulate service to Celil because that will set a precedence because too many overseas Chinese obtained citizenship of a third country by illegal means.
These are all law, not politics, so very easy to argue.
Waiting for an opportunity to learn from you.
(To help other 51ers to understand, shall we use lay language instead of quoting relevant sections of the Act and cases?)
s在这里说的很清楚了。抓住了问题的关键。
最初由 Sedona 发布:
Clean Hand
There is a legal principle: clean hand.
For example, if 2 guys robbed the bank and thereafter, the first guy took all the money. The second guy cannot call police or sue the first guy because his hands are not clean so he cannot be protected by the section of the law he has violated.
The law you quoted is applicable only if the person has obtained his citizenship from a third country via legal means. If he obtains the citizenship unlawfully, he cannot quote this section of the law to apply to him, because his hands are not clean.
In other words, Celil has not lost his Chinese citizenship.
中国缉拿恐怖分子 加拿大却悍然包庇