工会是不是太霸道：老师志愿活动也管？

您真说错了，教师确实是3个月没有工资。 教师的工资说是每个月发， 其实是把9个月的工资拉成12个月发。 这篇文章的算法，却是把9个月的工资除以9个月的时间， 但是没有算那三个月。 所以他的算法绝对错误，如果这样算的话， 那教师3个月的薪水为零，那是不是应该打75折？ 不要以为FINANCIAL POST 就怎么样，它代表的是右翼的看法。 教师要拿这个工资要10多年， 要接受5年的教育， 这样的工资很高吗？

老张，牛啊， 又帮老师涨工资， 不是78而是100了。 我不是教师工会的， 所以不要用什么工会之类的来教训我。 我在上文说了老师有三个月是没有工资的，所以你那100元如果有的话，至少要打75折， 而且老师有很多要当代课老师多年的， 才能熬到这个工资。 如果工作10多年才拿4万的， 那就是LOSER，只能怪自己无能笨蛋， 不要对老师眼红。

老张，你这么嫉妒老师的工作怎么不去申请老师的工作啊？老师的大门向你敞开着， 你看连TDSB的局长都是中国人，你应该申请啊。 还有， 你嫉妒的应该是CEO，1年7百万啊，人往高处走吗。

自己可以古狗一下，Ontario Teachers hourly rate. 可以看到以下《财经邮报 Financial Post》的一篇文章： 安省教师：　　$78 宇航工程师：　$40 兽医：　　　　$38 土木工程师：　$37 ＨＲ专家：　　$28 网站设计开发：$25 记者：　　　　$24 另外美国的教师：$41 注意这些说的都是平均数，而不是最高工资。另外还没算福利。《财经邮报》的文章说，如果加上福利，教师小时工资是$100。而其他工程师则没有这种集体福利。 当然，老师是很重要的，教师关系到孩子的未来，教育关系到一个国家的未来。对比希腊等欧洲国家，加拿大算是不错的了；对比其他省份，安省教育算是最好的了。教师应该知足。 http://business.financialpost.co ... gle-we-cant-afford/ Excessive teachers’ wages a boondoggle we can’t ignore Howard Levitt Oct 2, 2012 5:42 PM ET Last Updated: Oct 10, 2012 3:26 PM ET Which group of 70,000 Ontario civil servants is paid slightly more than $78 per hour? To put it in perspective, the average Canadian aerospace engineer earns about half of this, at $40 per hour; veterinarians $38; civil engineers $37; HR specialists $28; Web designers and developers $25; and journalists, I am afraid to say, just $24, less than one-third of this group. So which group of public employees must Ontario taxpayers be so generous toward? Let me provide some hints. Relative to these earnings, this position requires modest education, limited qualifications, there is relatively weak competition to obtain entrance, it has limited barriers to entry and its members enjoy an unparalleled lifestyle (even apart from their wages). The answer: teachers. My figure is based upon information provided by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario as to the required minimum days worked per year, hours per day and average annual remuneration. Elementary teachers make up more than 70,000 of the 114,000 teachers. The rest are secondary school teachers, whose average hourly wage for the time they are required to work, based on more limited information from the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation, is the still surprisingly high sum of $68.73. Teachers may protest that they work much longer hours than what is required by their collective agreements. That is undoubtedly true for many. But employees in other vocations similarly take work home. And, in terms of the necessity to perform additional work, preparation time is already negotiated into teachers’ collective agreements as part of their required minimum work day. The point is that teachers, like other civil servants, are not required to work longer than the amounts negotiated for them by their unions. Once they have taught the same courses for a certain number of years, many likely feel no need to, particularly since their collective agreements make it virtually impossible to fire them for weak pedagogical skills. Although I note a simple hourly wage of $78, teachers’ real wages are much higher. First, there are the gold-plated civil service benefits. Then the sick days they can accumulate and be paid out for up to six months wages. But most important, after a combination of age and years of service totalling 85, teachers as early as 55 can retire and be paid 60% of their salary for life. And they can earn this while working somewhere else. This makes their effective hourly rate exceed $100 per hour. No such luck for aerospace engineers (or journalists).

78元应该是包括福利，养老金等一切纳税人养一个教师的钱。不是教师工资单上的毛收入。和加拿大汽车工人工会一样，也是平均70元。

陈国治说的.