1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 本地 /
  3. GTA交通拥堵能否改善?今年有望解决 /

GTA交通拥堵能否改善?今年有望解决

根据联邦统计局在2012年7月1日所做的人口普查结果,多伦多人口总数为 2,791,140人,城市人口数已超过美国芝加哥成为北美第4大城市,名列前3的分别为墨西哥城、纽约和洛杉矶。人口的快速增加导致的最直接后果就是交通拥堵,加拿大统计局公布调查结果显示,多伦多居民花在上下班的交通时间在全国之中最长,每天往返工作地点的交通时间平均为81分钟。

随着安省交通管理机构Metrolinx“大举措”(Big Move)交通拓展方案报告最后期限的临近,以及大多伦多地区公民行动联盟(Greater Toronto CivicActionAlliance)“如果每日通勤节约32分钟,人们会怎样利用?”运动的展开,多伦多市的公共论坛“感受拥堵”也在如火如荼地进行着。

多市公开论坛探讨资金话题

据CBC报导,多伦多首席城市规画师 Jennifer Keesmaat,上周在多伦多市政大厅举行了“感受拥堵”的第四次公众活动。该活动旨在测试多伦多人对交通拥挤的感受,同时确保每一个可供选择的解决方案能够摆到桌面上。目的只有一个,既让驾车人士少占用道路,又能创收,以应对基础设施建设的巨大开支。

加拿大新闻

两个小时的公众论坛围绕两大主题展开:第一,讨论多市应如何优先考虑新交通规划。第二,针对负责GTA及汉密尔顿地区交通建设的省级交通管理机构Metrolinx所推出的区域交通预算展开辩论,多市怎样筹集到必须的资金。

科丝曼特对到场的约100名民众表示:“交通规划是建设一个宏大城市的基础,而交通规划需要资金。”一个工作组的与会者拉斯基(Jonathan Laski)表示,很高兴能够参与磋商。他说:“看来,人们终于准备好了进行一个真诚的会谈,包括我们如何为此付出。”

“感受拥堵”公众论坛,除了公开会议之外,还依靠社会媒体来传播,包括一个脸书(Facebook)页面、一个推特(Twitter)帐户和一个用来调查交通资金来源选择的互动网站。

在线调查列出了供市民考虑的可能的收入工具,诸如提高燃油税、提高个人所得税、车辆登记税、公路通行费和水电费帐单征费。不管是采用一种或多种税收,每年多市得筹集到20亿加元,以支持Metrolinx的交通规划。据悉,“感受拥堵”第二、第三期活动将分别于4月至6月、7月至11月进行。

60%大多区居民愿付钱扩公车系统改善交通

大多伦多地区有六成市民相信扩大公车系统是减少交通挤塞的方法。 一项最新调查报告显示,大多伦多地区(GTA)有六成市民相信扩大公车系统是减少地区交通挤塞的方法,不过在付出多少以及用何种方法付费则存在差异。

鉴于掌管大多伦多及咸美顿地区交通网络的「都市连通」(Metrolinx)、多伦多以及周边市政府目前正在谘询民意,就如何解决大多区交通完善计划所需的每年20亿元资金问题寻求办法,民意调查公司Forum Research于上周对该区1,750名市民进行电话访问,就上述问题展开调查。

结果发现,66%的被访者不介意多交10仙公共交通车资,只要多交的费用是用于改善交通,减少上下班花费在交通上的时间。

约71%的被访者表示愿意支付每年少于5元至100元不等的家庭年费,来支持扩建交通路线的工程;同意每年缴付5元或更少者占18%,10元至50元之间者占38%,而愿意付出50元至100元者,也有15%。

当被问及他们喜欢那种交通工具时,有35%答地铁,17%答轻轨(LRT)。

对于多伦多市中心交通堵塞的解决方案,有42%的被访者同意在贾丁纳高速公路(Gardiner Expressway)上建收费系统,每公里缴费5仙,并将缴纳费用用于兴建「市中心缓解线」(Downtown Relief Line)地铁线。在赞同者当中,多伦多居民的比例为45%,比使用该公路的周边城市居民比例高出7个百分点。

此外,该调查还发现,虽然有八成被访者知道都市连通是个省府掌管交通的机构,但仅有20%的人知道该公司为改善大多区交通状况而推广的「大移动」(Big Move)工程。

Forum Research总裁Lorne Bozinoff认为都市连通需要改善其宣传策略,让大众更好的了解其现时的工作以及目标。

该项调查是于上周二至周四期间,通过电话访问的方式完成,误差率是正负2%。

“大举措” 投资策略报告:6月1日出台

2008年Metrolinx建议通过一项大举措”(Big Move)的交通拓展方案,耗时25年、投资500亿元,改善GTA及汉密尔顿地区交通状况、解决交通拥堵问题。截止至今年6月1日提交的“投资策略”报告,将触及“大举措”方案筹资问题。

多伦多市“感受拥堵”活动的结果将纳入Metrolinx的该项报告。

大多伦多地区公民行动联盟去年10月推出的“如果每日通勤节约32分钟,人们会怎样利用?”运动已经进入了第二阶段。

第一阶段旨在推广“大举措”交通规划,并提及资金来源问题。对于即将在今年3月初展开的第二阶段活动,大多伦多地区公民行动联盟首次执行官亨特(Mitzie Hunter)表示,这些交通项目的资金来源将成为关注的焦点。

网友评论

网友评论仅供其表达个人看法,并不表明 51.CA 立场。
GCD执政这60多年,农民是最大的牺牲阶层,从50年代的`剪刀差`,到90年代的`无偿`劳工,再到新世纪的土地猎夺。
回复
中国的大建设,是好几亿农民工的功劳。他们就是现代活生生的奴隶。 建议加拿大引进20万中国的农民工,给与他们(包括家庭)PR身份,签10年劳工合同(赎身),实际待遇(按生活水平算)比在中国翻倍。 这样不出10年,啥地铁,高铁的都是小菜了。 加拿大能这样做吗?会这样做吗?
回复
加拿大很难这么做,因为社会舆论肯定会谴责,不公平阿,这真的想现代奴隶奥,给他们签合同,$10/小时,其他死活,生活,生病统统不管,干不完十年的送回中国,能干完的给PR,来去自由。美国,欧洲也可这么做,但行不通。
回复
All in all, the sale of the highway presented a hijack of what previous governments had planned, and ultimately did not serve the public interest in the manner it was originally conceived in. http://prudentpress.com/politics/the-highway-407-hijack-how-ontario-became-a-have-not-province-pt-5/
回复
When politicians sell out citizens, you get Highway 407 An arbitrator says Ontario highway operator can charge any tolls it likes Toronto - When governments put the welfare of corporate friends ahead of citizens, you get Highway 407, the 108-kilometre toll road operated north of Toronto by a private company called 407 ETR. In 1999, the former Conservative government of Mike Harris, then serving a five-year term as premier, gave 407 ETR a 99-year lease to run the toll road as a private business, charging motorists whatever it liked. Recently, the company jacked up tolls by as much as 200% at peak hours. Now, an arbitrator has ruled that the contract signed with 407 ETR by the Harris government was so airtight the company has every right to do so, and the public be damned. The current Liberal government of Premier Dalton McGuinty plans to appeal the ruling but there is no guarantee it will be any more successful than it was at arbitration. In other words, Mike Harris and his corporate pals in cabinet did such a first-class job of selling out citizens that 407 ETR may be able to thumb its nose at every elected government in Ontario until the year 2098 - another 94 years. Company crows The company was quick to crow over its victory. "The province (meaning the McGuinty government) had alleged that the company did not have the right to increase tolls without first obtaining the government's approval," 407 ETR said in a weekend news release. "Specifically, the government suggested that the company had to file a 'Change Request' in order to increase tolls and was in default for not doing so earlier this year. 407 ETR disagreed with the government's position, pointing out that the contract signed between the company and the government in 1999 did not contain such terms and conditions," it added. "We are pleased with the independent arbitrator's decision," said Enrique Diaz-Rato, president and chief executive officer of 407 ETR. "All along, our position has been that we are acting in compliance with the contract." Who is 407 ETR? A company called 407 International Inc. is the sole shareholder, operator and manager of 407 ETR, which runs east-west just north of Toronto. In turn, 407 International Inc. is owned by a consortium comprised of the Canadian subsidiary of a Spanish company called Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte (which is co-owned by Grupo Ferrovial and Australian-headquartered Macquarie Infrastructure Group) and Canadian-based SNC-Lavalin of Montreal. Outrage - for what it's worth The McGuinty government has expressed outrage at the ruling but whether it will ever be able to do anything more than that is not clear.Transporation Minister Harinder Takhar argues that the 99-year lease is so extreme no one could reasonably expect unfettered rights to last so long. "It's inconceivable that any government would have given a private consortium the unfettered right to raise tolls for 99 years." Inconceivable? ETR 407 doesn't think so and neither, apparently, did the Harris government. The contract does allow the province to "renegotiate" the contract with 407 ETR every five years but there is no obligation on the company to agree to any changes - or to restrain itself from demanding exorbitant compensation if it does. Welcome to the modern world of privatization, a story almost always ends the same dismal way. Corporations win, people lose. Web posted by NUPGE: 11 July 2004
回复
"3条动脉变成2条": 407哪儿去了?人们不能用了?想过政府Keep 407这十几年纳税人要多交多少税吗? "车辆又翻倍":哪儿来的数据?
回复
我不支持加税,或提高开车人的花费。原本就已经交的够多的了。我在边远的小地方工作,就住在边远的小地方。那些喜欢住多市中心的地方的人喜欢把时间花在路上就让他们花好了。谁让他们把住得地方离工作地这么远?他们应该卖房子搬到工作地附近。增加税就是变相的把我们的钱拿到得利人的包里。
回复
x
x