评论列表
  1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 本地 /
  3. 抢楼花时你知道还有多少房子等着建吗? /
  4. 全部评论 /

抢楼花时你知道还有多少房子等着建吗?

阅读全文
大家都不傻,辛辛苦苦挣来的钱省吃俭用被高房价一夜之间全部吞噬,只要是工薪阶层谁也不愿意啊。你政府和议员站着说话不腰疼(或者干脆就是既得利益者),说些“慎重再慎重”之类不阴不阳的政治正确话语。老百姓一旦错过一个机会,很多时候一辈子也就错过了。在这个世道里面买房有点象找另一半,你错过了一个对的人,也许此生再也无法找回。或者说,也许20年后当你60岁的时候可以负担一个你40岁时候的dream home,可是谁来补偿你这失去的人生最重要的20年家庭生活? 按我的性格,只要不超出家庭承受底线,该买还是要买。鬼才知道,今后10年20年会怎样,就算20年后还是只值这点钱,至少,我拥有过,享受过了。
回复
仅仅在5-6年前,100万以上的独立房在加拿大还是完全的豪宅概念,就是因为可负担性的原因,家庭收入没有16-20万以上,都难以负担100万以上的独立房,地税加利息等各项成本在正常的贷款利率下(4%-5%)加起来在4-5万以上,相当于一个普通人的税后收入。加拿大人追求高的生活质量,除了房子的支出,还有车贷,信用贷款,购物,服装,美食,旅游,玩乐,根本不够花的。 现在多伦多和温哥华,遍地都是百万豪宅,都是拜长期低利率加上贷款失控,大量海外买家(尤其中国)和本地炒家所赐,这种房地产泡沫,一定会随着美国进入加息周期加上美联储缩表,带动全球央行的加息和缩表,利率的快速上升,加拿大贷款的收紧,海外买家的受控,政府对炒家和投资者的限制,地税的跟进上升还有中国房地产的泡沫破裂而破灭或缓慢收缩。
回复
100万以上的独立房作为投资目前都已经是负现金流,美国进入加息周期,利率很快就会上涨,甚至翻倍,100万以上的独立房很快将需要支付4-5万的年利息和其它成本,租金顶多3-4万(政府已经限制租金上涨的幅度),严重负现金流,所以说自住可以,投资慎重。 100万的独立房,假设首付20%,以目前的贷款批准条件,家庭年收入没有稳定的16-20万收入是拿不到80的贷款的,除非做假(有没有看到次贷信用公司最近的下场?),所以大多数的加拿大家庭都拿不到这么多贷款。不要说投资,连自住都买不起。 15%海外买家税给了海外买家当头一棒,特别在房价高企的时候,谁也不愿意再傻到在风口浪尖上做接盘侠。 还想拿几套独立房做投资的,再好好想想。
回复
俺劝你等工薪族别不顾自己的实力买什么独立房, 再租几年也许房价就下来了, 实在经不起诱惑,就买个二手糠抖先住着等, 等待房价下跌再买大的。 放心, 房价绝不会永远上涨, 总有跌的时候。不要那么浮躁嘛, 还充满仇恨。。。别人买100万以上的独立房作为投资亏不亏损, 你有必要那么关心吗?
回复
忘了说一句,这个所谓的列治文山市议员廖立晖,为什么不把低层房屋和condo的规划比例透露出来?这些应当是给大家知道的。天知道你这8500多套房子里面是不是7500套condo,900套汤耗子,才100套独立屋? 遮遮掩掩的,忽悠谁呢?😡
回复
为了佣金,经纪又来造谣伪造刚需了。 光劣市就要建8500多套房子, 还没算GTA其他地区的数量,房子几年后可能就进入供过于求了。再等等是聪明的选择, 急吼吼的是经纪哈。😂
回复
GTA平均房价应该是500万加元才合理。不是人人有房住,阶级划分日月形成;就像每个人的工资不一样。有的年薪100万有的3万。。。。。。;所以,今后10%的人才可买房;90%的人只能租房。
回复
祝你通过要发生的这轮房地产洗牌,变成那90%。看你还这样说不?你的心地太坏了。好好反省。
回复
现在政府已经不允许任何除5大银行之外的小Lender借钱给投资房了。 大银行对投资房的利率也比自住房高0.2%左右。
回复
如果这是真的, 就是根据政治风险故意忽视经济风险的决定了! 同一个100万的房子,银行贷给自住的肯定比贷给投资的风险大。 因为自住的可出租面积肯定少于投资的,所以风险来临时, 自住房分租可收的租金远少于投资房。 还有买投资房的首付比例一般大于自住的, 手头可用的抵御风险的资金也大于自住的, 因为没钱断供的可能性小于自住的。 不过, 投资房业主数量远小于自住房业主数量,政客不故意偏向自住房业可能有政治风险。 美国次贷危机就是美国政客回避政治风险, 最后国家遭到经济风险打击的最好例子。历史一直在重复, 银行也被迫为政治服务, 即使他们知道这不符合经济规律, 是错的。
回复
回复 加拿大老张:是不是真的,你现在去买个投资房,去试试贷款就知道了。 自住的一般只有一套房,一般得保住。 投资房的Owner一般有好几套房,在投资收益下降甚至负收益的时候,套现的可能性更大。 至于贷款风险,很难说那个更高,自住的也可以出租部分。 政府的政策主要是鼓励自住,提高投资门槛。
回复
回复 gonow2008:从银行贷款安全的角度考虑,这不是什么保住不保住的问题, 是贷款是否亏损的问题!自住房首付低,业主家底薄,收入也不一定稳定,一旦市场变坏价格下跌,光有“自住的一般只有一套房,一般得保住”的信念, 就能保证银行贷款不亏损吗, 还得靠钱说话吧?!危急时刻,就算拼租金还贷款, 你自住的也拼不过投资的吧, 你总要50%以上自住嘛。所以, 银行喜欢投资的人, 是有道理的, 在商言商。你非要从什么人权民猪普屎价值说事, 硬说自住的才如何如何合理,就没办法了。
回复
展开 1 条回复
Billion Dollar Fund Manager Comes Out Of Retirement To Bet Against Canadian Real Estate https://betterdwelling.com/city/toronto/marc-cohodes-short-canadian-real-estate/#_ Foreign Money Laundering “You have a story that people laugh at, a college aged girl buys a $31 million dollar place to live in, she didn’t earn that money herself. She said it was her father’s, when they asked what her father does she said she doesn’t know.” While he didn’t specify the specific story he was referring too, he does appear to be referencing Tianyu Zhou, a “student” at UBC that was able to purchase a $31.1 million mansion in Vancouver’s Point Grey. As a student, Zhou was able to obtain a $9 million dollar mortgage from CIBC. Interestingly enough, her LinkedIn says she worked at the UBC cafeteria in her first year – a gig typically reserved for low income students. “It’s international money laundering coming into Canada…regulations are very lax”, he further explained. “China has capital controls on their money, and Canada does not have respect for a nation that has capital controls”. Bloomberg estimates that US$500 billion in capital has been moved out of China by mostly individuals, with a significant portion of it landing in Canada. Much of that has been moved into the Toronto and Vancouver housing markets. Non-Prime Lenders “I think it’s horrifically bad, there shouldn’t be private lenders.” –Mark Cohodes If you’re a Canadian that has your mortgage with one of the Big 5 banks, you most likely don’t realize that we have a bustling sub-prime lending industry that exists with almost zero regulations. A few have interest rates as high as 15%, with a 15% fee for renewal after the first year (because what’s an extra $150,000 on a million dollar loan right?). Some go so far as to lend you your down payment, so you can skirt the federal regulation of minimum down payments. Or as Marc says, “As long as you can borrow more, you can keep the Ponzi going”. Home Capital Group (HCG) is where Marc is betting the implosion of this industry will begin. Despite not being a household name, HCG has built a mortgage portfolio that’s around 1/5th the size of BMO, impressive considering BMO had a 160 year head start. Shortly after Marc began shorting HCG, an anonymous letter to the board of directors explained irregularities in their numbers, which forced the board to launch an investigation. The board revealed around $1 billion in fraudulent loans, that they traced back to 45 brokers. They stopped doing business with the brokers, and that $1 billion was quietly adjusted to $1.9B. “Home Capital Group has admitted to $1.9B in fraudulently underwritten mortgages last year alone,” he explained. “FSCO, who regulates the brokers, hasn’t punished the brokers. The problem is when there’s criminal behaviour going on—and originating fraudulent mortgages is criminal behaviour… you’re allowing one class of individual to benefit another. If you allow it to go on, what’s the deterrent?” Find that a bit confusing? Marc broke it down for us, “if I went to your town and robbed a bank and broke the law…and you caught me and know who I am. My punishment is ‘you need to leave town tomorrow, I won’t name you but you can’t do this around here no more’, what urges me to stop? Me and my whole crew should be put in jail, there should be an investigation by the RCMP on exactly what happened, and who was involved.” It’s hard to argue with that, most of us would say yes, there should be an investigation and someone should serve time. He goes on to say: “Were these mortgages insured by the CMHC?”. The 45 brokers have not been named to the regulator, and HCG has said that taxpayers are on the hook for the fraudulent loans, as they are mostly insured by the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
回复
建议大家查查这个市议员在这个采访同时说的话,“我们预计未来10年Richmond Hill人口会增加25万”。新增住宅才8500?这25万人住哪里去?
回复
一天到晚说房子。抢抢抢。应该查这些人的钱从那来的。还有没有别的新闻。
回复
你几巴急啥,不是我忽悠,是媒体报道这个和你一样傻逼的议员说的,我当然不信,但就是十年增长20%,也有4-5万人,这8500套还真不多,更别说这8500套是7、8个开发商,慢慢挤牙膏一样的开发了
回复
俺早说过, 次贷才是加拿大房市的最大问题, 不是什么海外买家或投资房。 可是次贷的都是有选票的本地穷人, 不少还有申请贷款时收入作假,政客明知道问题在哪里, 也不敢整顿次贷问题, 坐等次贷危机爆发。
回复
嘿嘿,拿康抖在建数目充数,廖议员真是会朦人
回复
按照列市的人口增长,8500 套房能撑过一个冬天吗?
回复
x
x