1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 本地 /
  3. 利用开公司少缴税不灵了,影响一大片 /

加拿大人利用开公司少缴税不灵了,影响一大片

加拿大政府近两年加紧了对逃税漏税的打击力度,特别是一些富豪的海外逃税行为。近期,政府又将目标对准了国内富有的专业人士。

据CBC报道,联邦财长莫奈(Bill Morneau)说,很多有钱的加拿大人通过成立公司来逃避缴纳高额税款,因为他们可以一边支付较低的公司税,一边从公司提取收入。

自1970年代以来,加拿大公司的数量已经翻了8倍。与此同时,个人税与公司税之间的税率差越来越大。

2017年的税率差是37.2%,意味着从公司支取收入的人,可以少缴大量税款。

这些人往往是加拿大的专业人士,如医生、律师,他们把收入分散给收入较低的家庭人员,从而可以按较低税率纳税。

财长提出的方案是进行“合理性”测试,判断家庭成员在生意中贡献了多少,是否与公司利润相关。同时,这项测试不会让一些合法的家庭生意受到惩罚。

财政部估计,全国有5万个家庭会受到这个新政策的影响。

报道称,这项改革是为了创造公平的环境,避免公司业主在缴税上比打工者更有优势。

按照目前的税收制度,如果公司业主利用家庭成员分散收入,可以节省最高$35,000元的税款。

财政部打击的另一个现象是:将公司收入作为资本收益(capital gain)报税,而不是作为股息(dividend)。

资本收益只有50%需要缴纳联邦个人税,股息收入的税率更高。

政府称,这一漏洞已经被相当广泛利用,新的法规会严堵这一漏洞。

另外,私人公司的被动投资收入也会成为政府的打击目标。

报道称,个人可以将资金停放在公司账户下,投资股票或其他金融产品,提取收益时按照较低的公司税率缴税。这对那些没有公司账户的个人投资者不公。

公司税率低是为了鼓励公司再投资和创造就业,而不是诸如在退休时少缴税。

预计,这些新的政策措施可以在未来给加拿大政府增加税金收入。

网友评论

网友评论仅供其表达个人看法,并不表明 51.CA 立场。
那么多钱花在木木身上,现在钱不够用了,开始满地找可以刮一层的
回复
增加公司税,控制股东分红,再加最低工资15刀,加拿大企业的严冬要来了。
回复
Justin will destroy Canada
回复
才长因该叫,无奈,或者没能耐
回复
土豆自己就开了若干空壳公司,除去35万的年薪工资外,其他远比这年薪多得多的收入则以公司收入形式缴纳很低税率的税。另外大家记得巴拿马文件揭露了无数的富豪及各国政客利用海外岛国空壳公司逃税的丑闻,闻到他时他一口否决。但不争的事实是土豆自己就在加拿大前后注册过3个加拿大公司,他就是一个兼职的drama teacher, 注册这么多公司,当然有税务猫腻。 看看当初2015年时,土豆坐飞机全国各地竞选拉选票时他是怎么吹嘘他坚决支持对small business业主通过公司避税得利,因为他们创造了就业所以通过公司避税是理所应得的回报。现在又翻脸不认人了罢,声称这对中产不公,实际又在为2019选举拉选票,全是政治把戏。 可惜的是许多人眼瞎看不清,当初把穿着皇帝新装招摇过市的骗徒选为国王,这样的人现在又重新穿上了为2019大选定做的另一套皇帝新装,他要得逞的话,可以肯定这个国家一定是被他彻底花空只能穷得裸奔了。 http://nationalpost.com/news/pol ... f-a29e-69cdf4c75ebb Trudeau is one of the wealthy Canadians he says benefit from small-business tax deductions “Liberal leader Justin Trudeau could draw on personal experience when he claimed that a “large percentage” of small businesses are used by wealthy people to shield income from taxation. Trudeau was asked about his plans for changes to taxation on small businesses during an interview with CBC, broadcast Tuesday night. “A large percentage of small businesses are actually just ways for wealthier Canadians to save on their taxes,” he said. “We want to reward the people who are actually creating jobs, and contributing in concrete ways. So there’s a little tweaking to do around that.” Trudeau himself was involved in at least three small business that were federally incorporated, one of which he used to receive income for paid speaking events he did between 2006 and 2011. He was the owner and sole director of JPJT Canada Inc., the corporate face of a speaking business that earned him about $1.3 million over a six-year period. The speaking fees became an issue of controversy in 2013 when the Citizen reported that he charged as much as $20,000 per speaking event, even after he was elected as an MP for the first time in 2008. He discontinued the speaking business when he decided to run for his party’s leadership. At the time, Trudeau was also listed as a director of two other corporations: – 90562 Canada Inc., the federal corporation that held a portfolio of securities that were part of Trudeau’s inheritance from his father, Pierre Trudeau, that he shared with his brother, Alexandre. The securities were managed by Montreal investment firm Jarislowsky Fraser. The corporation was dissolved in December 2013. – 7664699 Canada Inc., Trudeau’s personal holding company, which was used when the inheritance was split up. In 2013, the company listed $958,000 in short-term investments and $255,000 in cash. Because he had incorporated, Trudeau could have lowered his personal tax burden by having any speaking-related expenses paid through JPJT Canada Inc.”
回复
岂止是土豆自己就开了若干空壳公司逃税, 咱联邦自由党政府财长家族的公司就在被公开的避税的巴拿马文件上, 至今也没消息说税务局如何处理的, 是不管不问吗?这货还有脸出来宣布打击“加拿大人利用开公司少缴税“?😂
回复
回复 加拿大老张:是的。财长自己家的人事管理大公司就注册在巴拿马岛国。其实这是加拿大政府自己与许多加勒比岛国政府达成的税务协议以帮助富人,允许加拿大公司洗钱到那些岛国交纳几乎为零税率的公司税,也就是将逃税合法化。 http://startouch.thestar.com/scr ... c3e0698c8%7C_0.html “The Clark government signed a tax treaty with the Eastern Caribbean nation in 1980. There are about a quarter million people living in Barbados, where the main economic driver is tourism. In 1980, what could have been Canada’s motives for establishing a tax treaty with Barbados? The treaty Canada negotiated allowed for Canadian companies to set up subsidiaries in Barbados. Those companies were then funnelled international profits and taxed at the Barbadian rate. In some cases, tax rates were cut from 30 per cent in Canada to 2.5 per cent in Barbados. The Star and the CBC contacted Leonard Farber, the former general director of the tax policy branch of the federal Department of Finance, to ask him why Canada pursued a deal with Barbados in the first place. Farber, now a tax adviser at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, said the benefit of a tax treaty between Canada and another country was to grant tax-exempt treatment for business income conducted in that country. When “income is repatriated to Canada,” it isn’t taxed again, he said. “The rational behind that was to facilitate Canadian industry competitiveness in the world marketplace,” Farber said. This was called a “double tax” avoidance treaty as a company is only charged taxes once. If a Canadian business is active in Barbados, it can pay the Barbadian rate, up to 2.5 per cent.”
回复
回复 星洲炒米:自由党的总理和财长等高层人士, 把自家的生意搬到海外避税天堂免税, 然后宣布加拿大人在加拿大本地开的生意要多交税, 这样才公平!😂
回复
加拿大ZF作为加拿大的统治阶级的代表 开始搜刮民脂民膏了,所以没事不要骂中国ZF了。一路货色
回复
x
x