1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 购物 /
  3. 特斯拉关闭所有多伦多门店 新款只卖4万 /

特斯拉关闭所有多伦多门店 19年新款只卖4万刀

这两天的消息,

都被特斯拉刷屏了!

加拿大特斯拉宣布:

将在短期内

关闭所有多伦多门店!

多款车型大幅度降价!

新款SUV Model Y

将在3.14发售!

我们先来一件事一件事说...

为了降低成本,特斯拉宣布将关闭所有多伦多门店,总计4家(全加拿大一共11家)。预计可以为车辆成本下降6%。

除此多伦多外,他们还会慢慢逐步淘汰其他北美的实体经销商,将精力主要转向在线销售。

Yorkdale Sherway Gardens

为了吸引更多顾客,特斯拉方面还表示,在网上购买特斯拉汽车的顾客将可以享受在周内免费退换服务!

根据退换协定,只要驾驶公里数低于1000英里(约1600公里),都可以进行退换。也就是说,你购买一辆特斯拉,然后出去玩几趟,开上几百英里,再把汽车还给特斯拉公司。这些都是免费的!

新款Model3 价格大降!

特斯拉新款经济型轿车Model 3的价格公布了,比预期要低很多!

美国Model 3的售价为$3.5万美元。加拿大为$4,7600CAD,中配也就$5,8000!

加拿大价格表↓

去年10月,特斯拉发布的Model 3的

加拿大定价为$58,800

而今年的新款定价,

却比去年低了足足1万多刀!

新款Model 3

可以说,确实

大大大降价了!

除此之外,Model X,和ModelS也有不同程度降价。

新款SUV:Model Y将在本月发布

Model Y是一款SUV,预计将在3月14日发售↓

Model Y和Model 3约75%的组件是相同的。由于Model Y的体积将比Model 3大10%左右,因此售价将比Model 3高10%左右。

据了解,在这款Model Y之后,特斯拉公司还考虑将在明年发布一款 特斯拉皮卡!

据说长这样↓

开出去是很拉风了!

看完了特斯拉最近的几个大动作,

不知道大家都有什么想法呢?

5万刀不到的Model 3,

大家会去买吗?!

网友评论

网友评论仅供其表达个人看法,并不表明 51.CA 立场。
电动车现在的价格本身就偏高。
回复
The Electric Car Fraud: CLIMATE and ENERGY The world is not ready for electric cars. Yet billions of taxpayer dollars have been squandered by our government on ‘green’ projects. Some feel that conversion to electric would be an advancement. It would not. Billions of dollars have been spent developing two types of extremely expensive electric cars; electric only and hybrids. The latter have a small gasoline engine to charge the battery. In both types, their $2,500 batteries have to be replaced every two years. Their four hour charging time is much too long for refilling at service stations. A massive infrastructure of grids and power stations would have to be built. The major problems with these cars and infrastructure are explained in this book. Hybrid cars are designed to run on both electricity and gasoline. Electric ‘only’ cars have no backup electric generators. The majority of the problems encountered lie in the support equipment and climate. The problems with the car themselves are listed in the book. The term ‘global warming” was hastily changed to “climate change” when it was discovered that the earth was not really getting warmer. Proponents of global warming claim that CO2 (carbon di-oxide) forms a layer in the stratosphere which reflects heat rays from the earth downwards thereby creating a greenhouse and raising the temperature of the earth. There is absolutely no practical reason for believing that this actually happens. But this is the reason given by environmentalists for eliminating CO2 But this theory collapses like a house of cards when it is put to the test of reality. Air and CO2 are miscible gases (which means they dissolve into one another) forming one homogeneous gas. Thus there can be no layer of carbon di-oxide in the stratosphere (neither man made nor naturally occurring) which is the mainstay of that warming theory. Reflection cannot occur within a homogenous. No layer – no reflection. No reflection – no greenhouse. No greenhouse – no global warming or climate change. There can be no argument. Yet billions of taxpayer dollars have been spent picking winners and losers (as of now, all losers). So there is no point in making equipment that does not exude CO2 because CO2 is not a problem in the first place. CO2 is an inert gas. Humans exhale it when breathing. To make the ‘culprit’ more tangible they refer to it as ‘carbon’. “Carbon emission” appears so much more threatening than “CO2 emission”. The chapter on “CLIMATE CHANGE” deals with this subject exhaustively. It takes the reader step by logical step in layman’s terms to the only possible conclusion; even if the climate is changing, it is not carbon dioxide that can possibly be the culprit. The power required to drive all the electric cars has to come from somewhere. ALTERNATE SOURCES OF ENERGY, other than NUCLEAR, have insurmountable limitations on continuity of supply and all are more expensive than gasoline. They cannot be used as primary generators. For instance, SOLAR units do not work in the dark or on cloudy days, WINDMILLS do not work in still weather and WATERFALLS freeze in winter in some geographical areas. Details of their advantage and shortcomings are included in this book.
回复
任何电动车我是不考虑的。目前电动车是等同烧煤的,而且处理巨量废旧电池环保代价极大。比起内燃机来,电动车就是一个谎言,何况还贵,用起来方便程度差得还很远。 不插电的油电混合好很多,但是电池处理还是不完美。
回复
只能说出了低端型号,不能说降价了,加拿大适用的四驱型号还是很贵,而且列出的价格有欺骗性,居然是扣除了省下的汽油费的价格,这个在提车时还是要付给特斯拉的,只是说之后不用加油了。
回复
x
x