1. 无忧资讯 /
  2. 本地 /
  3. 技术移民及父母团聚的申请时间将加长 /

技术移民及父母团聚的申请时间将加长

加拿大保守党即将上台,有些华人对移民政策前景看好,有些则持悲观态度。当地专办移民申请的律师孙家骅认为,未来中国专业人士若想申请移民加国,或帮父母申请团聚移民将会更难,申办时间也会更长。

据北美世界日报报道,在电访中,孙家骅表示,保守党一向不支持移民政策,反映了该党前身“加拿大改革党”(Reform Party)维护英裔加拿大人利益,及争取西部省份更多政权及经济利益政治的主张及宗旨。

他认为哈珀在选举期间所提出的三项移民利多政策为表面功夫,试图走中间路线,在巩固原有支持者外,又可吸引中间选民。

他指出,哈珀在竞选期间所提出的移民利多政策,像减半现有申请移民的975元落地费、成立专业认证咨询机构,及收养子女被加国公民收养申请程序完成当天自动成为公民,只对加国本地公、居民有利,对于想要移民到加国的人士并无直、间接的好处。

他以专业认证机构为例,表示此机构只是与省合作,帮助现居本国的专业移民人士,像是医生、工程师等的专业技能,尽快取得认证,早日找到工作,对于想申请移民的人士,还是得经由现有的认证审查程序制度,移民政策根本没有放松。

他认为保守党方便有钱的投资移民,因为他们对加国有利,而过多的外来专业移民,有可能抢走本地公民工作机会,而技术性的拖延他们的移民申请,因此他认为,哈珀执政后只会接受对加国有利的移民政策,对移民申请的要求及标准,将会借口性的提高及拖延,像父母移民申请的时间,将有可能拖长,让很多老人因年纪过大,等不到申请通过就过世,以避免他们在无能力对加国做出贡献下,只来享用加国的医疗及养老福利。他也认为收养外籍儿童大多数是本地的主流白人,与移民政策无关。

他表示,各政党均认为加拿大需要外来移民,以求经济稳定成长,然而申办移民的时间却过长,像目前在中国北京申请移民的时间需要6到8年,对此政策上的问题,却不做出任何修改,然而却每年花大笔钱做移民的调查。他认为政府应致力留住到本国求学的留学生,他们在本地接受教育,适应了当地的生活,了解当地的文化,但却无法在毕业后找到工作。

他表示,有许多能力强的留学生因此选择回到原居地,虽然同时申请技术移民,但在发现原居国有更大的发展空间后,而决定回原居国发展。他认为三级政府应当合作帮助留学生在毕业后顺利找到工作,发挥其才,如此才不会造成社会人才的流失及浪费。

网友评论

网友评论仅供其表达个人看法,并不表明 51.CA 立场。
加拿大应学习美国的移民政策... 工作签证快的多,好处也是明显的。 没有工作,即使移了民,大多数最后还是“回流”了。
回复
最初由 西门飘雪 发布: 签证不是更麻烦,老得签不是? 😁 如果有稳定而收入又不错的工作那还可以.但是好多年不回家还是觉得不应该的.
回复
最初由 vitalemontea 发布: 移民太麻烦了,拿个签证算了. 签证不是更麻烦,老得签不是? 😁
回复
Perspective: Chinese Labourers The treatment of migrant labour in Canada reveals the limited extent to which immigration was actually open to all. Chinese labourers had long been attracted to British Columbia, previously working in the fur trade and joining mine workers by the time of the Gold Rush of 1859. After Confederation and following the beginning of railway construction, larger numbers of Chinese migrants, first from California, later from Hong Kong, arrived in British Columbia. When an American contractor began building the B.C. section of the CPR, the numbers of Chinese labourers significantly increased. Between 1881 and 1884, some 15,701 Chinese males came to British Columbia, many to work on the railway. Local prejudice grew against these newcomers who were characterized as "unassimilable" migrants. Negative stereotypes of Chinese males circulated in local press editorials and in B.C.'s legislature. Local complaints against Chinese and Japanese labour consistently ebbed and flowed with the province's economic booms and busts, and usually intensified in periods when locals believed that poorly paid Asian labourers were taking jobs from Euro-Canadians. During more difficult economic periods, fears rose that the "Yellow Peril" would "inundate" the British race. Such local fears became a powerful political rallying point for members of B.C.'s political community, who demanded immigration restrictions from the federal government. Patricia Roy's study of B.C. politicians and their policies towards Chinese and Japanese immigrants suggests that racial and economic fears prompted local political action. The B.C. government introduced a series of acts to limit and restrict Asian immigration as early as 1878. The federal government disallowed almost all of them. Macdonald's federal government would not "close" the door to Chinese labour because business interests, mostly in Montreal, saw the benefits of this work force. Poorly paid and exposed to the deadly hazards of mountain valley blasting and construction work - many Chinese labourers died through disease and injury in this treacherous terrain -- the Chinese labourer was understood as integral to the railway's completion.
回复
Who have been misleading/appealing new immigrants to vote for the Liberals? the one who belongs to the Liberal interested groups. How can new immigrants get benefits from more and more competitors in their career? Ignore what Liberals say, watch the result of their action.
回复
If no immigrants is flooding into Canada, how the some employers can hire cheaper labours ? also, for some immigrants lawyer/consultants, where they can earn their easy-money? I believe for these kind of peoples, they will definitely vote for Liberals, because they belong to interested group.
回复
x
x